Why is that, exactly? Where are the creatures whose skulls these are? Do you see them walking around? No? Hm, could it be because they're extinct? Are the dinosaurs still alive? You assume they are transitional forms to humans, that is your error. <TABLE cellpadding=8 width="95%" align=center bgColo
[quote]I guess you've never heard of the genus Australopithecus or the other species of our genus Homo, which have been found in fossil form, not in fantasy-fiction form. But, as usual, I'm sure the facts don't interest you.[/quote] [quote]Since I just said that science admits no proof...[/quote] So, all the fossils prove nothing which makes them not fact?
[quote]Um...don't you believe in a God?[/quote] But of course. My point is that just as you would consider a belief in god is outrageous I would counter that the notion that the transitional forms went extinct IS equally outrageous.
[quote]mmmh? i have been enjoying GalCiv since release and am looking forward to the Altarian Prophecy and of course GalCiv2, but still it doesn't keep me from playing other games too. So why beeing so negative? [/quote] Agreed. The world is big enough for more than one.
Voodoostation trolled but is the fun of JoeUser as well. His analogy lacks any sense, I think there were drugs involved. As for links I can certainly provide them as I am sure you can (but have not). So I think my case is backed up as much as yours. However, I can assure you that no link you can provide will prove your argument. The notion that the transitional forms went extinct IS as outrageous as believing in a god or subscribing to
It does not showup in my stardock list. The option in settings is set (show pre-release/beta), I am on 1.30.xxx but nothing. The only think I can think to ask is whether it makes a difference whether you bought the download vs. CD? Thanks
[quote]I guess you've never heard of the genus Australopithecus or the other species of our genus Homo, which have been found in fossil form, not in fantasy-fiction form. But, as usual, I'm sure the facts don't interest you[/quote] Of course I have heard of them. That genus (Lucy and all) suffers from several inconsistancies to what would accepted as in the line of man. First, there are issues with the brain cavity being too small, the claim
It does not showup in my stardock list. The option in settings is set, I am on 1.30.xxx but nothing. The only think I can think to ask is whether it makes a difference whether you bought the download vs. CD? Thanks
Happy, happy, joy, joy!!!! I just saw that GalCiv:AP public beta is available. Cannot wait to get home tonight! Woohoo!
Sounds great, but finish GalCiv AP already would ya! Just joking....
I ain't 'fraid of no God! Hehe, not yet.
The cluelessness is this post is rampant. Recent findings? Quote them. Ever so slightly? Everything evolved from bacteria. No one said we evolved from chimpanzees. The theory states that we and chimpanzees have a common ancestor. It is not a magical transformation from a gorilla to a man. Learn some science before y
Ah, yes the mighty and fearsome French.....
Agreed that the WMD was not the legal reason for the war, most anti-war, anti-Bush people cling to that like a security blanket.
More power to Dish Network.
Nice post, never you mind the children.
Bring it on!!!! I am ready for GalCiv:AP!!!! ;)
> Ah to be in my 20's again and know everything and be cool
Arghhh... sorry I can't help myself :-) [quote]As a religious book, sure, it's "valid." As a source of science information, it is not.[/quote] True, and it can be equally said that science is not a valid source for information concerning the meaning and purpose of life. The magical mix of chemicals is just as far fetched as any God. [quote]So when you make a claim, you don't have to defend it despite the lack of evidence? Thi
[quote]Frankly, I'm kind of annoyed at both of you. My original post was about allowing for both sides, and you two are going at the polarization of the debate. Knock it off.[/quote] Sorry, I could make the case that Bulby drew first blood. But since this is your blog article and you have asked the debate to end I will stop.
[quote]I'm saying that the Bible is not a science book and, when it comes to science, should be ignored completely.[/quote] That it is not a science book should be obvious. But that does not invalidate it. [quote]It would be extraordinary if it were magic, but it was distinctly unmagical. What is the big deal about that? Bacteria are complicated chemicals; out of complicated chemicals they arose.[/quote] Still is just as far fetched t
[quote]The Bible gives an account of how the various organisms appeared on the Earth. Evolution gives another. They are contradictory.[/quote] So are you saying the Bible should be taken literally? There is no room or chance for more to a story? Are the red letters in the bible the only words Jesus said? [quote]I knew you would pick on this. The existence of God is an extraordinary claim. YOU ARE CLAIMING THAT THERE IS A BEING OR AN ENTI
[quote]Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. The default condition is no God; if you claim that he exists, the burden of evidence lies with you, not with the skeptic.[/quote] Why not the default be that God exists? Then you claiming that God does not exits makes the burden yours. It all is a matter of perspective. One that you have zero chance of influencing and I likewise.
[quote]Of course not.[/quote] Why not?
I believe in evolution, I do believe as Darwin did, that we evolved from apes. Now as for the story of adam and eve, well I believe that its a story with ideals behind it. Not everything in the bible is to be taken literally, in my opinion. Could the bible be literally true and still allow for evolutio
JoeUser Forums
Stardock Forums