hardly a rediculous assumption, your wife was obviously one of those women who had a perfect pregnancy, never got morning sickness, nor mood swings, nor any of the other joys of pregnancy, hmmmm? Cheers
And yet you served in a position in the military worthy of stripping your identity from most public records and receiving death threats from the IRA?
It just seems strange, your site calls you a tycoon from Gloucestershire, but a tycoon of what?
So, how did you make your billions Sir Peter?
Favorite Norm story: Link
Once a child is independent of it's mother, it is a person, would you argue that a handful of cells were a person? So, if a pregnancy miscarries is the mother guilty of murder, or the child guilty of suicide? Since suicide is a crime in every state, we ought to prosecute someone right? If a mother is bolemic or anorexic, which causes the child to abort, is she guilty of murder? If a mother drinks wine, and the baby has birth defects or is still bor
Now, whether it's good for "democracy" or not, it is reform Cheers
Quick check on the laptop while my class writes their essays, Sir Peter, if you are truely as connected as you say you are, say "Hallo", to my (distant) cousin, Norman Lamont. You ought to know him yes?
Because Private Citizen Clinton and Gore had access to material which is still considered classified, further, the questions which they would be asked would pertain to that classified material, file a petition under FIA and see what you get. Cheers
Anyway, I've got to go teach a class, as interesting as the discussion has been.
Oh, and if you really are a Noble Maxwell, you're as Scottish as I am. Cheers
Obviously, I will do some more checking, but your proof is not sufficient, fortunately, my friend, who as I mentioned is a leader of the Church of Scotland, has access to the records. Oh, and if someone wins the lottery and opts out of publicity, their name is still usually accessible through online records, only their addresses are withheld. Cheers
So, you're saying that you were granted a knighthood, and ABSOLUTELY NO RECORD of that event exists in the world? Then, once the current queen dies, that means NO ONE remembers you were a knight, and so it didn't happen. Alas, all those poor schmos who thought they were receiving a great honour, but wanted privacy and so their name disappeared into obscurity.
And the reason you appear in no other records? I'm sorry but "opting-out" doesn't remove you completely from every list of knighthood
I'm not using it to argue against you, the thing is, and this is the best part, while I admit there is a system where knights can avoid social notice, the Knight, whether he wants to or not, is kept in records, records that are kept, among other places, online. There is no law stating that a person's name must appear inthe London gazette, nor did I say that every knight is listed there, however, since 1900 nearly every person receiving the knighthood
HIV came from Gay people? Now there's an interesting rant, you got some proof of that Marvin? Last I checked the best theory on the origin of AIDS was from someone who ate an undercooked monkey in the African wilderness. Cheers Oh, and still no proof on "Sir" Peter Maxwell actually being a "sir"
You engaged in the "opt-out-honours-system"? Even more believable, especially since every person receiving their knighthood since 1900 is listed in the London gazette, whether they value their privacy or not, and if you valued your privacy you wouldn't be trouncing about on a blog site using your real name, nor would you put up a website which <TD class="mb-B
Your website provides the proof? When I can't even find your name on the online registry of english knights? You expect me to believe that you are a real knight because of a website you yourself are puting up? Sure
Fortunately, my family was never corrupted by the germanic royalty. I actually know someone high in the Church of Scotland, but when I search for you, the only thing I come up with JoeUser sites, now why is that? Surely a real knight of the Realm would be listed in some official capacity, right? Cheers
Nearly as great as your own? Assuming you are the real Sir Peter Maxwell, you did what, got bopped on the shoulders by the queen with a sword? That makes your lineage great? I can trace my family back 1500 years, I'm related to last Archduke of Finland, the Romanovs, three of the last Earls of the Realm of Scotland, which, though much more difficult to prove, means I'm related to the Stuarts, which makes m
The truely ironic thing is of course, when you kicked out Oliver's little family you went and put in another Scottish King, and then, during your Glorious Revolution, you went and kicked out one Scottish Monarch and put in another one. Sure, you English definitely haven't been relying on the Scots to "stiffen the royal breed"
Besides, James VI is a scottish King. Need I remind you what you British do to your own kings, say what was done by one Oliver Cromwell? Or what about the War of the Roses? Cheers
The only defintion I could find in my dictionaries which equated spelt to the way you used it was: 1. To tell; to relate; to teach. [Obs.] Might I that legend find, By fairies spelt in mystic rhymes. --T. Warton Now, if you were relating the word, you are correct, however, I am not incorrect because if you were Spelling the word, it's spelled. Cheers
The proper way to use Spelt in the sense that you wanted to use it, is if you were using the past participle, you weren't, so it's incorrect, I realize your stiff upper lip makes it difficult to admit you're wrong, but no one will think less of you. Cheers
By the way, that's from the Fourth Edition of the American Heritage Dictionary. Cheers
JoeUser Forums