I am vote for it, as well as "uploading" player logo in new game creation screen.
10 Replies
8,472 Views
Lord KiRon
3
Posts
26
Replies
15,378
Reputation
Hm... it was same with me and GalCiv1 , actually it was not downloaded by me, my friend brought me it but after playing for couple of hours I ordered it. After that preordered GalCiv2 as soon as it become available.
29 Replies
17,789 Views
That's what I am saing from the start.
33 Replies
33,169 Views
If you set planet to produce ships to relay point right after you get message that ship is built (it automatically leaves the orbit) you can't see it at all. But if you click on the space near planet where ships are usualy "exit from orbit" it will "magically" appear from nowere
8 Replies
5,258 Views
To put it simple there is no tooltip any more on ships names when you "goto" into planet ship production screen on event , so if you have several ships orbiting ... it's rtather hard to tell which one which ...
1 Replies
2,270 Views
I don't know I never type my serial in, only once when I bought the game, after that it downloads patches quete nicely.
10 Replies
6,506 Views
Well I tested this option and it works well. You just have create a transport with a lot of weapons early in the game, load it with a lot of weapons , nothing else, use if for atack only on small ships (this case you will probably fire first and kill on first fire) if you lucky enough you will make few victories with it so it get XP and there for HP will grow , after that .... you got the idea.
23 Replies
16,734 Views
I like the new function, actually. I like it too *sometimes* I just hate loosing old functionality
33 Replies
33,169 Views
hey probably banned you because they felt what you said would start a long thread on piracy... well it did It's also poss
14 Replies
8,195 Views
Same here, but no savegame, functionality restores after you exit the game ...
12 Replies
4,575 Views
Reply to
Change Ship Design "Upgrade" to optionally keep non-jewelry components?
in Galactic Civilizations II
Stardock Forums
Stardock Forums
https://www.galciv2.com/Forums.aspx?ForumID=162&AID=106137#822731 (I should be less "pushi" )
8 Replies
11,424 Views
SmackleFunky , this probably was directed to me ,I did made font a bit bigger then should in original post Bingjack , you right about problems for "visual designers" , but you should think about "just gamers" too, after all it's not 3D Max it's a game, that's why I added ite (5) in original post, I think it would satisfy everyone.
33 Replies
33,169 Views
Wait and see You know something we don't ? I mean I love the way developers listen to users but to "listen" someone have to talk, that's why I started this thread to begin with.
33 Replies
33,169 Views
I am too against "auto upgrading" the weapons but this still means I DO want to be able to CHANGE them manually , not to fit everything from the beginning each time.
33 Replies
33,169 Views
i was burned too bad with x2 to try x3. x2 was a buggy mess on release that had extremely poor combat compared with freespace and xwing (I was spoiled!!) Well X3 was even more buggy but it's great game. Nevertheless I personally bycoting Egosoft because they banned me from their forum when I in
14 Replies
8,195 Views
Excuse my ignorance, but what was the 'ugly remove button bug' ? Very simple , you could not remove more then one "thing" defore adding the other when updating. So if you let's say wanted to update 4 "Laser III" to 4 "Laser V" you had to " remove 1 "Laser III" , add one "Laser V" , re
33 Replies
33,169 Views
But i must admit i feel a bit sorry for stardock. They've just changed the system because of complaints only to earn new complaints from others. So if others are happy, i can live with it. Have to agree with you but I think it was a quick solution to fix ugly "remove" button bug, now we should "press"
33 Replies
33,169 Views
Do you like new ship design policy introduced in latest upgrade that in case you select "upgrade" removes all the "items" from she ship except hulls and visuals ? Well I started this thread because personally I DO NOT like it. It is an improvment over buggy "Remove" button but it's not good either. The reasons "why" is simple : - Some "things" removed are also act as visuals (engines, weapons,..) and after
33 Replies
33,169 Views
Reply to
Starbases - too important in game - option to turn off
in Galactic Civilizations II
GalCiv2 Forums
GalCiv2 Forums
I instead of turning starbases OFF would add option to choose minimum distance starbases range , with 3 default like now it could be nice to be able to increase it, or may be increase automatically according to galaxy size. This would take care about "too many starbbases" issue.
23 Replies
12,221 Views
Well , the tutorial is bad , but only because it's low res when playing it fullscrteen , anything else is ok.
21 Replies
15,546 Views
Amen to that
16 Replies
21,077 Views
Well I just go and say "it's like what MOO3 should be" for most of my friends it's enough
12 Replies
13,637 Views
Is it steam powered ?
26 Replies
32,455 Views
Reply to
No Copy Protection, is it really that big a deal?
in Galactic Civilizations II
GalCiv2 Forums
GalCiv2 Forums
It's a big deal for me too, I don't like paiying another $40 because my CD got scretched. Also most copy protections are nothing but trouble for your Windows. Also if Windows gets updated or hardware (like moving to SATA) it might not work at all because copy protection . Not to mention you have to have CD in drive all the time this not only unconvinient but causes it get damaged more therefore you will have to buy another one... </
5 Replies
13,190 Views
And here is same starbase as it really looks: http://img235.imageshack.us/my.php?image=starbase84look2wb.jpg
2 Replies
3,707 Views