Jepel

Jepel

Joined Member # 731097
3 Posts 0 Replies 871 Reputation

That's a big point. Why US should do whetever it want and with a total contempt of other countries willing. It look like the big bully of the class... Refering to the original article, (if someone still remember it): This distorted view postulates that because we are stronger than others, we must know better and we must have right on our side. That is where religious fundamentalism comes together with market fundamentalism to form the ideology

48 Replies 33,259 Views

living without TV ot any kind of electric entertainment. You would need to learn to play an intrument if you want to listen music, you would read the paper for news, you will live your life instead of watching soap, you will talk using pigeon instead of Joeuser,... it could be good ...

7 Replies 1,654 Views

You right to point that this can be considered as a linguistic problem. However as everybody should have the same right including the one to officialise a relationship with partner regardless their sexuality.(ie tax, accomodation,...). After using the word marriage or civil union is just a proble of culture. That is not necessary the case of homosexuality. I have just post a small and funny article about that saying that homosexuality is quiet spread within the animals. They even manage to e

13 Replies 5,641 Views

New Page 1 Merci a toi d'avoir clique sur ce lien. Logiquement, cela devrait signifier que tu es francais ou que tu parles francais. Juste par simple curiosite, je me demandais combien de francais frequentaient JoeUser.

5 Replies 2,111 Views

Brad: you are right saying that arafat was (is still?) a terrorist. But sharon had continusly show no respect to Palestinians, as people or as country. Remember 1980 slaughter in Liban, remember also that he ignited the second intifada by visiting the Mosque's explanade 3 years ago. Ha has always embrass the colonisation policy. I really don't know what to think about his recent pronouncement of leaving some colonies.

39 Replies 27,213 Views

None of them want to reckon that going to war was a political decision. In UK they first blamed the media, now they blame the intelligence. I think only history and next poll are going to juge them. Reading a good article in the guardian from gary young, I noticed a good sentence: "This war is not just killing Iraqi civilians, resistance fighters and coalition soldiers. It's murdering any pretence that we live in countries that value, let alone practice, the principle of democratic

7 Replies 7,380 Views

Blair popularity is diminished, so is his credibility but still no one can beat teflon blair... There's more chance that someone in its own party take the lead than any other party win.

6 Replies 6,501 Views

I have to agree with jeblackstar, removing Saddam can't be considered on the war on terror. The war on terror was used to attack Saddam. No one can defend Saddam, he was a despicable dictator, but why him? if human rights and democracy were at stake there's a lot of other dictator. What would be your position if all the democracy of the world decide to unite and to attack one by one the despots and implement democracy? Would you pay for it?

48 Replies 33,259 Views

I thing that he used the word extremist due to this extracts "This distorted view postulates that because we are stronger than others, we must know better and we must have right on our side. That is where religious fundamentalism comes together with market fundamentalism to form the ideology of American supremacy. " Going to Iraq seems to be a decision taken on ideological ground, thus the need of concept such as preemptive strike. Us

48 Replies 33,259 Views

I think there is a mistake that is frequently done. Israel is a state with every attributes, military power, welfare, parliament,... The Palestinian haven't, The like of Hamas or any terrorist group are not the soldier of the Palestinians. On one hand you have state power, and on the other small groups militants. One has nuclear weapon, the other rock, stones and a lot of brutalised people without any hope and ready to blow themselves. Terrorists are n

39 Replies 27,213 Views

New Page 4 Sunday afternoon, working in the lab.... It is almost the climax of my weekend, it's around 4p.m, the day is almost off and I'

0 Replies 1,851 Views

New Page 3 A funny story about being gay and penguin... that might have be spread by Windows aficionado to make Linux geeks look gay... New York flips as penguins come out in C

0 Replies 1,805 Views

Without saying anything stupid, but by definition Terrorists aim to terrorize a group of people to put their objectives forward. So one can wonder what is the objective of Al Quaida, if it's really to destroy America and by extension their European allies that share the same democratic values, so provoking a civilisation clash with the Arab world would look like a better way of doing it. 9/11 was an atrocious and horrible attack, but it was more aimed to put Al Quaida under the spotlight an

48 Replies 33,259 Views

Whahkonta: I know you are right and I'm aware of the process. Usually when I post an article that is not mine, I try to keep my though down as I prefere reading what other think. It's start to be relatively predictible, and I like people to develop an argument, not doing some useless remark. So I try to make them going on As far as it goes, I have read more aggressive comments without any good point so far from the opposant of my articles in g

48 Replies 33,259 Views

I don’t want to go into Clinton/Bush Comparison. First, I'm relatively ignorant about this period, Second whatever did Clinton I don't see easily the connection with Bush. I have found a little talk about Clinton policy vs Bush at http://stevendedalus.joeuser.com/index.asp?AID=6942. If you are really interrested. Brad: would you call Sudan, Iraq and Afganistan a war? Was a coallition of the willing gathered in order to do it and pay for it? Oops: very strong argument... I hardly know ho

48 Replies 33,259 Views

OK, what was the case for war if WMD wasn't the only issue. Saddam was a brutal dictator, US and europe knew it from the last 20 years during which they have been his bank and his weapon shop. They are a lot of other brutal dictator in the world, so the US is now in crusade to free people from all the dictatorship? Why does saddam was moe to be removed that any crazy dictator in africa? If you have an answer...

5 Replies 4,848 Views

I don't think you can say that Clinton was more unilateral than Bush. Looking Back, Bush was the president that had wasted the sympathy and the support generated from 9/11. Anti americanism is now much more spread that under clinton. Remember, before the war started, we could see the biggest global protest the war. In UK, it was the biggest protest ever... As youprobably now, there are no proved linked between Al quiada and Saddam. Under Saddam Iraq was secular and fundamentalism was s

48 Replies 33,259 Views

Frogboy, First, I haven't written this article, I have copy on my blog, because I approve a parts of its content. I think a lot of its arguments are valid and should be respected. Second, only the foreign policy of the US is discussed there. As I'm not a US citizen, the social policy of any US president are not really touching me. I don't have to vote in US, I prefer countries with more reliable polling system. I'm not registered democrat, I'm not even democrat, I don't know what my pol

48 Replies 33,259 Views