gmc2

gmc2

Joined Member # 732298
8 Posts 398 Replies 2,309 Reputation

uploading images directly into the post as opposed to calling on an external site to relay the image back. this would be especially helpful in the help sections of the forums (concur with IslandDog's thought here) do something with the wiki to make it effective, it seems pretty barren on information/help.

203 Replies 273,982 Views

[quote]I think at the very least this is something that should be made available for the support forums. [/quote] absolutely a worthwhile consideration, hope it makes the cut. [quote]I've been using ImageCave for a long time now and have no troubles[/quote] thanks Angus, if I find the need again I'll look into it. I'll bookmark ImageCave for future reference.

11 Replies 6,425 Views

[quote]I'm pretty sure it's due to the amount of storage space required for something like that.[/quote] here is where I get a little confused. I would think that if an image was imported that regardless of source that the image would be stored here??? It sounds like you're saying that the link is embedded in the post and the external site is called upon to post the image each time the thread is opened??? AND I guess that you are all comfortable allowing these third party vendors acce

11 Replies 6,425 Views

While WC/SD are making BIG changes to our site experiences I was wondering if they would consider making it easier to upload pics to the forums. My understanding of the current process required, to which I've never been successful, requires the use of third party vendors, creating off site secondary accounts and making changes to my current security settings to allow access via third party cookies. Not sure how this compliments my WC experience as I have yet to have a positive experience with

11 Replies 6,425 Views

[quote]Cool mate, wimpy was a little.... wimpy[/quote] it did kind of lose its meaning after I had to drop the "@warped.org" part of it (years ago). And with all the changes happening around us (and a DrJBHL comment) it just felt like the right time for a change. But you all can just call me Greg.

24 Replies 10,096 Views

[quote who="DrJBHL" reply="1" id="2026315"]That's better, mate! Karma to you on the name change. Just don't use Barbara. That belongs to Angus. [/quote] thanks DrJBHL. I think Agnus may have a touch of ALZ, he keeps forgetting his name.

24 Replies 10,096 Views

[quote]If you select nothing and click the quoate button it qoutes the whole post (with name info, etc). If you select text and use the quote button it just quotes what you selecdted.[/quote] thank you, Zubaz

94 Replies 94,037 Views

I like the screen shot, looks a liitle like WB. Comparing this to the current site presentation it looks a lot better. [quote]Yeah ID, a seperate section with movies would be good, like tutorial video's, now I like that idea[/quote] I guess then that instead of this, " There is currently no text in this page, you can <a title="Special:Search/SkinStudio Help: MDIControls" href="/wiki/Special:Search/SkinStudio_Help:_MDIControl

94 Replies 94,037 Views

[quote]IE for me, with all it's faults[/quote] I came to a similiar conclusion sometime ago, maybe for different reasons. I find the security settings of IE to be more robust than other browsers. As far as slowness, don't be to quick to blame the browser. Some sites are just really slow and with the uploading of ads and flash content can be even slower. Did you have other complaints?

18 Replies 41,287 Views

[quote]In not being browser specific I meant, Impulse would not be the only browser able to see the forums.[/quote] Impulse is a web browser??? HG, I think you and I are on the same side of the fence. We both want WC to survive in some usable format that doesn't lose the community aspect that we have come to love and respect. How this ends up only time will tell. Please you all, most of my cynical comments are rhetorical (food for thought, just thinking out loud, etc.), and wh

69 Replies 108,347 Views

[quote]does this include people that are still using IE6?[/quote] Okay, first of all my comment was kind of tounge in cheek. It was like saying "We're not browser specific, you can use any browser you want as long as it isn't IE6..." I was attempted to point out the irony in the statement. [quote]There is a point of diminishing returns to support a browser whose traffic total slides more and more towards 0 every week.[/quote] Well Yoda, could be simple cause and effect

69 Replies 108,347 Views

[quote]Take a chill pill and reassess won't you ? [/quote] in the form of dark chocolate covered caramels. Yumm! and I agree that the fork in the road is somewhat off in the future and I'll evaluate what's up when "it" happens. and of course, thanks for the kind words.

332 Replies 494,056 Views

[quote]Anti-flash and Impulse? Why?[/quote] anti-flash? not quite however the use of flash for advertising detracts from my web surfing experience. easier to eliminate (disable) it than enable/disable/enable,etc. I have a separate browser that I use for viewing video content. anti-Impulse; possibly. My impression of this program is that it is a software management/control and payment program, and that it requires flash to operate correctly. While this may be something good for

69 Replies 108,347 Views