[quote]I'm not a good enough player to join such a great empire. LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL [/quote] I don't see what you mean: it is clear with the Laws of the Diplomats that the diplomats empire is not about scoring and there are no longer alignement restrictions. So BUZZZZ Wrong excuse :) Try another one :)
Stardock Forums
Looks like there is a new empire logo. Is it definitive?
[quote]I actually think that difference in score between a Tiny and a Gigantic is to big. In my experience it isn't much harder (if harder at all) to play Gigantic than it is to play Tiny, so right know you get rewarded basically because it takes longer time to play. I don't mind a small reward for choosing a large map, but right know i find that reward to big.[/quote] Maybe the reason behind such a difference is that you can submit more games on tiny that on gigantic. So some bonus are
[quote]le traducteur diplomatique c est une merveille[/quote] C'est une marchandise. La merveille ne profite qu'à une seule civilisation alors que la merchandise peut être "revendue" à d'autres civilisations. Si je me souviens bien, la traduction française est "ommnitraducteur". [quote]quand on construit une base a cote d une resource doit on y envoyer des cargos ou cela se fait automatiquement autrement comment faire pour vendre ce que la resource produit [/quote] Qua
[quote]Coming from Europe, whose only unassisted war victories of the 20th century are Rainbow Warrior1 and Rainbow Warrior2, we'll take that with more than a grain of salt.[/quote] I maybe wrong, but I am remembering that Rainbow Warrior1 and Rainbow Warrior2 implie only french people and no other western european countries , and I would add that evenement in Egypt in 1956 where England and France were involved was a military victory that went into a diplomatic failure. I could be
[quote][quote]Je crois qu'il faut soumettre une partie au metaverse[/quote]Ca pourrait etre ca, ca fait un bail que je ne m'en soucie plus (ou que ca ne marche pas).[/quote] Fait attention a la baisse du score du fait du veillissement des parties lors de la prochaine soumission.
[quote][quote]Forward the saved game to Cari and she can locate the problem. If it works fine on her system then you know it's your game files and not the save[/quote] Which game files? if i have four save 'game files' three of which CTD and a fourth that doesnt, then the problem is with the beta not with any other files.[/quote] I have perhaps missed something but I have understood the post you are responding to as : Forward the saved games that cause CTD to help Cari to find the b
[quote]Each to thier own, i like to build an empire by mlitary domination, if i want to wipe out all the other civs on the map by using starships and transports till theres only me left and possibly a 'buddyminor' ive kept my frieghters going to, why should my game be penalised in score when i have enjoyed it as much as someone who likes alliance / tech / cultural etc? Just because you dont like the military victory doesnt mean no one else does, and it doesnt mean the person is a cheat either.[/
[quote]I think it would be a great idea to have a penalty for disabling victory conditions or as I understood Sirian - why not just make disabling of victory conditions a 0 Mv-score.[/quote] I think that 0 Mv-score due to disabling a victory condition is a bit harsh: - disabling tech victory: I only see the need in a scenario. If I don't want the tech victory, I just need not to research the final tech. So I don't see the need for penalty. - disabling cultural or alliance victor
[quote]The UP bans the construction of new terror stars, it doesn't remove existing one, at least I don't think so. [/quote] I think also that it is the case. But it could be the issue of the first meeting of the UP and the outcome depends mainly of the votes of the "good guys" (who ban it) against the votes of the "evil guys". And for the first UP meeting, there are good chance that the outcome will be against the resolution you vote for. [Message Edited]
[quote]Unless terror stars are rated as a thread by the AI they are a great alternative to Maxtipherous's straight short lines. It just depends on the lay out of the card and if you already have terror stars available. [/quote] Don't forget that UP can sometimes ban Terrors Stars...
[quote]Referring to messages #21 and #22. I am playing single player and every time I play a game if the Tech sharing issue comes up for a vote the game and my computer locks up and i have to turn off or reset my computer. was a solutioon found to this bug or is it a matter of elimintaing this issue from the votable issues library file? [/quote] Have you look at the sticky thread about UP tech sharing issue bug with 1.13? [Message Edited] [Message Edited]
[quote][1] -- If it would be likely to imbalance this by dragging out the end of the game (by, say, gifting the AI's a class-12 planet and sitting there with a declared war for 20 years), then just normalize these values by your own nation's economic+military. This would only accumulate significant points if you were picking on people about as strong as yourself. GalCiv AI is good enough that you can't just sit on a war with an equal power. [/quote] I read in another thread, maybe on the str
Since we are in a thread about a wishlist, I would like to have the following, that I have already mentionned in the thread "detail of a tribute": being able to know about the current tributes: what are the monthly amount and when they expire. It could be in the screen that explain the percentage of an alien civ's economy due to trade the the percentage that is due to trade with us.
[quote]I too want tactical battles... I Don't understand why tactical combat doesn't fit in GC or why people don't like it... It seems to me that if it doesn't fit in GalCiv then it doesn't fit in MOO 1, 2, 3 or any other 4x game. What am I missing? How many battles are you guys in??? Throughout my games I may have a dozen maybe two. So two-dozen tactical combats is going to slow my game down and make it tedious? I don't think so. Instead it's going to be more enjoyable! Tactical combat does bre
[quote]- Fleet attack and defense? Don't tell me a fleet is an organizational unit! I have 12 corvettes! I want them to work together and take out a dreadnought! It's okay if I lose like 3 or 4! At the moment, I have to send them one by one against a dreadnought which is sheer suicide, or when defending against a battleship with 40 drone fighters, the fighters die one by one while defending, as opposed to the battleship dying, and me losing 15 drone fighters.[/quote] I should have misse
Stardock Forums
[quote]It's a program the Mid-Western Confederation wrote that shows difficulty and game submission stats. It's really great![/quote] Yes, but the program has some problems with submission in foreign versions: if you look at my stats with statbot, you will see that it can understand only the english: the map size "normale" (which correspond to normal) is in the chart but not in the array to the right. When I submit in french, it is under the 1.10 version and in english under 1.13
[quote]To dumb down the tech factor, Stardock issued this multiplier. They also dumbed down the population to avoid big points for long games. [/quote] [quote]The dumbing down of alliance victory in itself is another story. People look at this victory as being not worth as much as others, and thus it should be penalized. I think it is totally silly, as it means -turn me off, ally with everyone else and win that way-.[/quote] As it would take more time (and so add some points to the final
[quote]Ok, maybe this question has been asked before, but why arent the 15 and 25 games submitted bars blue too?[/quote] Have you try to enforce a full reload of all pictures? I have meet this problem too and it is linked with the caching of pictures.
Ok, lets' pratice some translations: (Ok, faisons un peu de traduction): french -> english la joue -> the cheek jouer -> to play (a game) je joue -> I play And now, the french translation of post #7 : (et maintenant, la version française du post #7) : Je joue au niveau dur actuellement, et si les relations diplomatiques sont amicales ou alliées, l'IA ne réagira pas à vos menaces, par contre se les relations sont neutres ou en dessous, elle réagira.
Stardock Forums
[quote]Bug report for the french version:At least two bonuses on the starbases aren't available in my version:The options are there but in stead of the bonus given it prints "string not found"I have the probleme for -Orbital Replicators-inverse tractor beam[/quote] If you look at the files where the modules are described (if my memories serve me well, CoreModules.sbmodules and BonusModules.sbmodules), you will see following: - for orbital replicators, "ProductAssist" has been transl
[quote]Thank you Senator Shalom Shemesh for helping to propel our little empire from the backwaters of "Page 2" to the front lines and "in contention"[/quote] I hope that senator Shalom Shemesh will wait enough time before he decides to visit another empire, if he plans such a thing, in order for the Diplomats to be able not to go back in the backwater of "Page 2" with his departure :)
Wouldn't be neat if there was a litte "?" near each option allowing to have a description of what the option is doing? As a play the french version, sometimes the translation isn't very helpful to understand what the option does.
Stardock Forums
[quote]What about the following sentence for the web site:"Come in peace. Or rest in peace!"Instead of "Come in peace. Or go in pieces!".Senate agreed - site has been changed[/quote] That strange, the senate agreed on "rest in peace" and the website has "rest in pieces" :) BTW, I change my nickname to match the graphic. Need a little update of the web site. And I have received the e-mail acting as a test
Stardock Forums
[quote]Note to all senatorsFor each request submitted via the website requiring senate approval, there must be a majority vote cast for the request to pass.[/quote] OK. Since I have posted the motion on the website at work and that the motion is send to my personnal e-mail, some delays are needed before I respond to my notion. BTW, due to the various timezones in which the senators are (I am in France and I suppose that some are in USA), we shouldn't expect that all senators vo