Stant123; sorry you are right of course. I was reading a speech from some Catholic answer man and he made that statement concerning abortions but I don’t know if I have the constitution to revisit Catholic dogma to find the source. … oh I remember it was a YouTube … but this clip is telling me the wrong message is getting spread. [video]http://youtu.be/qYOuHJsYi04[/video]
Myfist0 … maybe we aren’t even talking about the right war, hahaha. How about we go way back to 1991 and revisit daddy Bush’s heroics, hehehe? [video]http://youtu.be/0fNtEmmTrJA[/video] Noam Chomsky (2/4) - talks about the 1991 Gulf War in Iraq
Sinperium; Science is also dispassionate … so it is up to us to control how we use our instruments (guns). Abortions happen naturally all over the world so I am not getting the God angle here??? Or is this one of those mystical things that is Devine for the Goose … but it isn’t for the gander’s chicks??? Legal and/or moral are not the same and since it is ‘legal’, this must be just a moral decision and a
myfist0; some personal opinions are much more appreciated than others ... and an actual pedigree tends to help. I don't seem to disagree with much of what I have seen from him ... but am still at odds over AGW. To me it seems he went too 'political' on that one ... my-oh-my, what's a bitch supposed to do anyway, but? [video]http://youtu.be/5khEOkzQR2o[/video]
[quote who="Daiwa" reply="447" id="3048963"]The 'best minds' have managed to screw things up rather royally actually.[/quote]What is wrong with you ... what has Chomsky been in charge of or screwed up? For someone pretending to be intelligent, you say the stupidest things hahaha. All any of us have are our "opinions" and yours are mostly unjustifiable. Noam has opinions which he thoroughly documents and which have been peer reviewed … and you just have more silly opinions to tr
myfist0, nice to hear from you again! I think the fight here is about over here though. Just thought I would throw out a contentious bone or two before I go away, but I don't expect any real takers about Moore because there isn't much to bitch about ... after the fact (personality aside). This thing would have fizzled out much earlier had I used someone actually competent like Noam in the beginning, but who can figure people out, hahaha? Happy gamming and ‘headhunting&rsquo
Well, now that all the BS is all out of the way ... Anyone want to go back to the original question and point out where Moore was unfactual in his documentary. We are well aware of what most people think of him personally ... now is your chance to prove him wrong factually ... I dare you and you and also you, hahaha. I am sure smaller clips are available on YouTube to make it easier for you. <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pQv_M_WQAxU&feature=results_video&playnext=1&a
Noam Chomsky on 9/11 Conspiracy Theories: [video]http://youtu.be/-_fFkLcRrBE[/video] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-_fFkLcRrBE Smoothseas; This is as close as I have found to my ideas and I think we all agree that a lack of applied intelligence was evident before, throughout and after 911. I just find more culpability in the intelligence agencies bosses bosses (the USG) for mismanaging what they did know and wha
[quote who="Brainsucker" reply="778" id="3047035"]Reply #778 Brainsucker[/quote]Brainsucker, I couldn't have said it better myself. If you believe in the bible well there is nothing wrong with that at all. Personally, I do not believe that, but so what? What do my beliefs have to do with someone else’s beliefs ... and vice versa? The same for science and religion … they are just not compatible and should not be used in some kind of morbid competition …
Jafo, GW: ... everything on my screen look ok ... what was meant by "... auto-attributed to Sinperium ..."???
Atheism is a word that seems to convey much more information to believers that to the actual people they want to talk about. From a purely analytical (theological) standpoint ... anything that doesn't comply with the traditions of those with whom you speak is in some way, shape or form ... atheistic ... by definition. This of course has nothing to do with me personally if for no other reason than it is too general and is all encompassing such as to have no real meaning. It is of course a
Sinperium, I have experienced euphoria several times in my younger life when my emotions were in control of almost everything … then I grew up and reality established itself. I was forcibly raised (three years) by maniacal nuns from hell continuously condemning me to visit them at lunch in their domain simply because I was uneducated in their ‘evil ways’ and would not kiss their ‘feet’. I acted like the child I was an
Sinperium, I have had an ongoing 'discussion' with 'ALL' sides of the aisle (s) on the topic of "Atheism is a Religion ... or not”, of all things unimportant, oh well. I posted a new article where I confess our treachery (hahaha) ... "The Religion of Atheism … Exposed". The article such as it is was intended to make a point ... not to draw crowds of unconcerned people with flippant comments. We may have some initial semi-privacy there and see what develops. And si
Sinperium, if that is the case, then you should be able to prove your experience scientifically then ... and that would be the end of the story (IMO). It isn't so much that I don't want to believe in miracles ... I just cannot is all. I wouldn't take your experience away from you even if I could because it seems to have made you a reasonable, knowledgeable and fair minded man. What matters MY beliefs and thoughts compared to that ... they are meaningless and unimportant to your me
Science and Religion … hump. Science couldn’t give a hoot about religion any more than it does for science. It never will if only because of our understanding of how things work … that is science. Whenever something becomes visible or detectable, that is the day science will become involved with it … not a day sooner. People who try to integrate these two ‘theories’ are: an obvious fool, a zealot or a con-artist. End of story!
I want to apologize up front to Lula and KFC and others for leading them astray of my (our) true intentions. But according to the master and atheist being what they are ... the cat is out of the bag … so what the hell. I am not going to apologize because I really, really, believe in my second hand god. Without further ado, I will let my pagan boss speak for all of us, hahaha. [video]http://youtu.be/MLs7qVr0fS0[/video] <span style="line-height: 115%; font-family: &#
Jafo sorry, not to worry though, I seem to have no problem coming across in this manner but … I don’t need any help, ok. It never occurred to me though … it’s just … it was ... an assumption … my-oh-my ... Wait a minute, you clicked play … and then it was disabled … it was you, hehehe. ... I can learn from my errors, for sure. PS: I did include the links if you are still interested.
Sinperium; For the American Christians at least the ones I encountered here on JU are Christian in name only. They know all the proper words to use but they don't know how to use them. It is pretty much a conversation buster when one starts with "you are going to hell for eternity (whatever that is)" ... unless you listen to me, hahaha. I have heard this stuff before but at the time it didn't mean too much to me ... now I know a lot more on the subject. American Christians for the mos
Sinperium , I do not look at religion as a specific problem theologically. And I certainly don't have a bone to pick with you or anyone else for that matter. My specific bone of contention is with the RCC and Co. ... pure and simple. After a while (for me) religion blends into Catholicism as I have been 'chatting'
Judicious use of words but no pass. I don't care what you think about my sciences and you don't seem to care what I think about them either. If religious folk had dined to be honest and upfront they might get more respect. Science is what it is and is always subject to reasonable modifications (proofs) and updates as our knowledge expands. Science can always be discussed but it is a self-correcting entity. Theology is also always open to discussions but there is a difference. Theology
Sinperium, this is back-ass-ward as are most things religious. First as to religion (IMO): The only people that pester me are Christians and as such all my comments are 'directed' at them ... I feel the same for all religions based on superstitions alone (pretty inclusive list I might add) ... so Judaism, Islam and all the others are included here too, just not mentioned by name. That being said, you Christian folk are the only ones here with any options. You guys are free to believe
It’s difficult to prove the fallacy of believing in God literally ... when I am not allowed any tools so to speak. You disallow me the use of common sense, reason, science, actual knowledge, actual history or any manmade source for this stuff ... and we are supposed to have a meaningful discussion ... HOW? Within these limitations there is but one argument left for me to make: You guys are out on a permanent lunch break hahaha. Give me a call when you realize there is more than one book
Look, take this wherever you want, but my quotes were off the first page on the whistleblowers website you gave to me ... you figure out why you didn't see them ... NMP. It doesn't take much intelligence to know that things were amiss ... and it doesn't take a career intelligence worker to make that determination. At some point you need to stop yammering about the obvious ... I don't know how many times I have to tell you I know who Scheuer is ... I know ok. FAHRENHEIT 911- T
Leauki #726, It was just a poke in the eye sorry. You went through your land/terra/Earth comment then made a point of telling me (us), “ the entire land was flooded "? So I am thinking, it doesn’t matter if the Earth is flat or round … if God covered the land with water then he covered the whole world by default … be it called whatever. I am not at all ready to stipulate to “<span style="background-color
JcRabbit #702, we are supposed to be talking the one God here, not some miserable city, state or country … GOD. God didn’t seem to have difficulties cleaning out His Heavenly House, although one would have to ask why it was necessary. ‘Free will’ was the culprit huh … do you know the definition of insanity? All free will is … is the ability to think for oneself without being told how to or why. Free will allows people to question their selves and their e
JoeUser Forums
Stardock Forums