Aqua.

Aqua.

Joined Member # 120987
0 Posts 0 Replies 11,510 Reputation

Morphium, have you gone to the link, clicked on the images, and looked at them? They're quite good, and if the bottom one had been abstract art (which the photo essentially is) produced by a graphics program instead of by God, it would probably rate an 8.

10 Replies 3,073 Views

Yes, the photos are public domain. No I didn't see any links about use, but on all government sites I've looked for that information, they've all said that their photos can be used freely unless stated otherwise. Yes, the walls are unmodified photos (aside from resizing and cropping). I'll touch them up and stuff if necessary, but I feel that they easily stand on their own. Take a look at what I linked to, they most definitely aren't your normal hubble shots <img src="http://images.stardock.

10 Replies 3,073 Views

I'm planning on submitting a couple of wallpapers that are NASA photos of the recent solar flares. http://www.nasa.gov/vision/universe/solarsystem/10.28Flare.html Would this have a chance at being accepted, or should I not waste my time uploading the submission? (I'm on dial-up)

10 Replies 3,073 Views

That's fine, I'm in the US and I simply cannot get it to display the weather for my area, even though I've tried entering my zip code a half dozen times or so. 28311

3 Replies 889 Views

missed zero Not quite as pathetically easy as the senior math exam at my school in '99, but I'm quite surprised that anyone could fail this test. Adv. Calc was a true pain though, I hope Calc III isn't as bad. [Message Edited]

27 Replies 6,290 Views

It's a waste of money, you can easily get 98% of the performance of the box you're looking at for under $2k If you want looks, look around the web for custom cases, there's some real awesome ones for only a couple hundred. The best PC out there these days is one where you go to your local computer shop (not a chain), tell them what you want it for, that you want the best, and that you want it to look cool.

19 Replies 5,261 Views

When I think of the difference between Winamp 2.x, Winamp 3, Windows Media Player, etc. is that WA2 is compact, functional, and fast I agree that the capability to alter the structural part of the interface is quite nice. I believe that there are other reasons that WB has a clear preference over styleXP. I've tried both, I found styleXP to be a bit of a pain and buggy at times, but WB has been perf

16 Replies 2,844 Views