craeonics

craeonics

Joined Member # 163
0 Posts 40 Replies 390 Reputation

Just found out what happens when you have no pagefile and fire up Photoshop. It starts complaining about how it needs at least 16 megs of swap, warns you that it's "dangerous" to not be using a swap file and then asks you if you want to continue. Hit "yes" and it works just like it always does, without a hitch. Stupid Photoshop needs to learn to use the scratch disks I assigned to it.

17 Replies 2,144 Views

There are only sixteen colours available at that point in time, so that's why the boot skins only have sixteen colours. Luckily, it's not a fixed palette, so there is some flexibility still. The devs looked into doing something to be able to use more colours, but it wasn't feasible.

9 Replies 1,347 Views

Don't notice much of a difference in speed, aside from not having to swap apps in and out. Less disk trashing is good, if you ask me. 'Sides, I set some registry keys to load the process into ram instead of scratch (can't recall what exactly though). /me has 640 megs of ram, with an average load of 2-300

17 Replies 2,144 Views

I switched it off, I think. I set the swap size to zero and even though the taskmanager claims the system still is using virtual memory, I can't find the swapfile itself anywhere. By the time Longnose comes out, I'll be old and grey.

17 Replies 2,144 Views

Looks like you're not running any shell whatsoever. The under-the-hood method of fixing things, which could kill your machine if you fuck up: 1) Navigate to c:\windows and run regedit.exe. This gives you access to the Registry, the database in which Windows stores all its settings. 2) Within regedit, navigate to these three lccations (using the tree listing on the left) and check if the value for "Shell" (which should show up on the right) says "Explorer.exe":

13 Replies 1,719 Views

Oh, I don't know. I started out as "master apprentice" from the get-go and when I complained about that (Apprentice? Me? I don't think so!) I suddenly found myself being "journeyman". Moral of the story: complain loud and often. Perhaps it's an idea to make the "skinner" title available to anyone who has uploaded something.

54 Replies 11,463 Views

Actually, the correct term would be data corruption. No files go missing, but a couple of bits get shifted. Something which only seems to occur when moving large (quantities of) files between NTFS partitions on the same drive.

64 Replies 17,055 Views

It's odd, isn't it. I've never had dataloss with FAT, but it occurs far too often with NTFS. And it's not my drives or anything, as those get regularly checked. By the way, "far too often" is once every so many weeks. Any dataloss is too often in my book.

64 Replies 17,055 Views

If you're waiting for WinFS, you can keep waiting for many years to come. And I believe it's going to be layered on top of NTFS, so it won't really be a replacement, more an add-on. For the average user, NTFS has no clear advantage over FAT32. More so for the power user though (to name a few: hard links, junction points, volume mounts and much faster defragmentation).

64 Replies 17,055 Views

The world needs more Attila's (where the hell have you been hiding these last few years?). The whole customer/non-customer discussion is besides the point. The real issue here is respect and lack thereof. Perhaps because of the indirect nature of the net you get to see people's egocentrical side more. And with all that said, forget about the ice. I _demand_ free beer! Pronto!!

52 Replies 21,850 Views