bob2002 "pay pay pay no thanks starts free stay free" Y'know. I initially thought Bakerstreet and Hippy were a bit harsh, but I'm beginning to appreciate their outlook on things. It's like trying to carry on a conversation with a sea spunge. Let me ask you this? Why should something stay free when its no longer viable to keep it free? Did you bother reading any of this? How does it stay free? So everything should be free, or it shouldn't exist at all? Is that your argument? I'm
Chris
That's the Universe Metal theme by Pixtudio. http://www.pixtudio.com Note that its part of a larger skin suite which you can purchase from for 8 bucks. Its a really kick-ass skin suite!
Cabbage may be bad, but I think asaparagus is even worse. Nasty stuff. blehh....
Supercalifragilisticxpialidoceous
This link gives a brief summary of the programs and the names of their related file extensions. https://www.wincustomize.com/index.asp?cmd=help
"without the skins there would be nothing to charge for, so they are charging for other people's work,its not their right to do that" This makes no logical sense whatsoever. They are two separate things. By your logic there is no such thing as hosting, bandwidth, delievery and so on (even though the reality clearly shows otherwise. To put in in realworld terms: When someone sends mail to someone and put it in the mailbox, don't someone put a stamp on it? A stamp which
How dow you defined "fine" when it comes to free websites? Downtime? crashes? bandwidth exceeded?, disappearing for days/weeks/months on end as they try to determine whether its worth it to continue or not? Constantly scrambling to find the cheapest colocation facility/deal they can wrangle for that particular quarter?
Hmm. Yes let's take a look at Neonwin and the fact that its up and then its down. And when its up, many times the forums are down due to the load, or they throttle the capacity down... I don't buy the sweeping argument at that argument that skinning should be and has to be a non-profit hobby and all skinning sites must always be free. Why? (Other than the fact it'd be nice, but then so would free cars, houses, CDs, DVDS...) And as has been pointed out many times, Wincustomize d
I am so not getting any of this...
The sharware version resets when you log back on. The full version doesn't have this limitation.
There nothing special about editing xml or ini files, there are just text. Though there are some commercial editors geared toward manipulating xml files. You could simply get by with notepad. There are some freeware and shareware text editors out there. I used to have a list of them but I don't have one handy. If you're looking for a good general purpose editor: I use UltraEdit http://www.ultraedit.com It's shareware ($30) but its a really good editor with lot
More Tolkien art than you can shake a stick at http://fan.theonering.net/rolozo
Does this mean Wincustomize is gonna have to upgrade to a quantum matter/antimatter warp-turbo charged, space-folding, flux-capacitor/Mr. Fusion-powered web server? "Cap'n she canna handle the pressure."
It's my understanding that there's a free version of Winamp and a payware enhanced version. I don't have a problem with this at all.
If you want a tease, look at the image of the skin browser on the Skin Browser new item on the front page
The branding thing is pretty nice way to go. For instance the official WinStep theme page on the WinStep site is really deviantart in drag.
Greetings buddha hat. It seems the article, brief though it is, has served its purpose.
There was a lot of confusion eariler as to what really was the final release versus what was a release candidate. It seemed the winamp web page was out of date and didn't really reflect the status of the software. It seems to be squared away now.
Tarkus, OSXP by Judge, maybe? https://www.wincustomize.com/skins.asp?searchtext=osxp&sort=updatedate&order=Descending&library=1
Mac OSX threads on this board: https://www.wincustomize.com/msgboard.asp?id=54557 https://www.wincustomize.com/msgboard.asp?id=53623 https://www.wincustomize.com/msgboard.asp?id=54125 https://www.wincustomize.com/msgboard.asp?id=52985 https://www.wincustomize.com/msgboard.asp?id=53040 <img src="http://images.stardock.com/images/smiles/sb.gif" border=0 ALIGN="absmiddle" ALT="Powered by SkinBrowse
I'd rather be dreadlocked....
WindowBlinds is a program that skins the existing standard Windows elements (it replaces the such things as the titlebars, scrollbars, toolbars, and so on). DesktopX is program that allows you to customize your desktop by adding such things as animated images/icons, free form objects, docks, and so on. This can be as simple as having a animated icon such as a clock, or a full blown theme that adds all sorts of doodads to your desktop. When you change WindowBlind skins, you have
starone, just hit the connect button. It should then take you to #wincustomize automatically.
You mean Essorant's Progressive skin? https://www.wincustomize.com/skins.asp?searchtext=progressive&sort=updatedate&order=Descending&library=1 Bear in mind that this is a pre-WinXP skin so it doesn't have the WinXP taskbar and startmenu.
Actually, this brings up another question that's been driving me nut when it comes to tweaking colors. In the Display propeties dialog's Skin tab (Win2K) There's an Advanced button that allows you to change colors/fonts for a skin on the fly. I've gotten the title bar font to change, but I've never been able to change the background window color. <img src="http://images.stardock.com/images/smiles/sb.gif" border=0 ALIGN=