[quote]I am sure you are going to be urging Obama to bomb the hell out of some other miscreant. [/quote] Again, you ascribe to me positions and statements that come from your warped view of me, not from anything I've said or supported. As far as what I will support and what I will not, I will take that as it comes. I won't be following Obama blindly. As I've listed many times in this thread, I've supported AND condemned military actions under Democrat AND Rep
Excalpius
[quote]And now that Oil companies are making paltry profits, are you now going to say they cant be a benefactor? [/quote] In what world are the Oil companies making paltry profits? They've posted records gains for years running now. Sure gas prices may be down (for a while) but that just means they're going to go back to making the profits they were before. Besides, the rise in oil prices was a BONUS to them. We went into Iraq in 2003 (before the surge in gad
[quote]Your source does not back up your conclusions, and the elipse does indicate the author was hiding something - and a closer look at the actual statement reveals that Armey was indeed upset, but did not say that Cheney lied. [/quote] So because Armey (who knows Cheney is STILL in office during this interview) doesn't actually say the "L" word, we now need to debate the meaning of the word LIE here? Numberous other accounts from less diplomatic members of the GOP White House
[quote]he article you link to merely documents that the Cheney/Armey meeting took place.[/quote] The first article documents the meeting. The second comes years later, in Armey's own words. And ALL of the Senators were lied to. It's why they A) feel pissed, and B) feel responsible. So they aren't pressing this treason issue because it's embarassing to ALL of them. Isn't politics grand? [e digicons]:P[/e]
[quote]The Bootskin Pro issue on 64-bit has been resolved. A build is being published at this moment. Please let us know if it works for you.[/quote] Works for me, thank you!! [e digicons]:grin:[/e]
Impulse is the delivery engine for Object Desktop :)
I just tried the new update v0037 and it WORKS on my 64 bit system! [e digicons]:beer:[/e] Mine was 64 bit Ultimate, UAC OFF.
[quote]Ok, installed the updated bootskin pro, and now it just states that it fails to apply any skin I try.[/quote] [quote]BootSkin Pro keeps saying there was an error while applying,help?[/quote] Many of us are having the same problem. Please report it here https://forums.wincustomize.com/330550/#1945872
[quote]The only authority/approval required by the administration was authorization by Congress.[/quote] Which was predicated on lies the administration knew were lies even as they were telling them. Sigh. Here was one of many articles about the meeting between Richard Armey and Dick Cheney when it happened. And <a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/washingtonpostinvestigatio
[quote]You served up a hanging curve ball there, but I'll be good & just say it's actually Object Desktop 2009. And I agree, "YAY!"[/quote] How do you know I wasn't cheering for LAST year's version? Hmmm? [e digicons]:P[/e] Seriously, thanks, fixed. Two typos in the same day. I'm tired, hehe.
It's the same one many are now reporting in the other thread. So far, it looks like at least a few of the people are on Vista 64. "There was an error while applying {SKIN NAME}" It fails with the default ones and any I create. My system is Vista 64 Ultimate SP1, 8gb ram, quad core 6600 on a 680i series motherboard. This machine has multiple Operating Systems installed and this one boots off of the D: drive if that helps.
[quote]I have Mailed a bug report to SD support detailing the issue. I too am experiencing it.. I would send in a report to [email protected] with you system info pasted in it.[/quote] Thank you! I will do that as well. :)
Duplicate post, so I'll just say... OBJECT DESKTOP 2009 is out! YAY! [e digicons]:beer:[/e]
[quote]They were already justified in proceeding with GW2 (really, a resumption of GW1) on the basis of Iraq's violation(s) of the armistice. [/quote] You just keep pushing that thoroughly discredited position there. Even Bush and Cheney won't say this anymore, but you just keep carrying that water for them anyway. [e digicons]*_*[/e]
[quote]I'm assuming you mean 'withstand'[/quote] Thank you sirree! Fixed. You betcha! [e digicons]:D[/e]
On Vista 64 Ultimate I am able to create a bootskin, but I'm unable to apply any of them, the defaults, or mine. [e digicons]:([/e] Note that my boot drive is D: (not the usual C:), and I'm using bootskin pro v 1.00.027.
[quote]Only AGP 8x provides the necessary bandwidth to run a dream. AGP 4x will not be supported.[/quote] Then why can VLC play full screen video on the desktop under XP and has been able to for years? Is there some fundamental difference between these two things? Genuinely curious.
[quote]Hey, I believe in fighting fire with fire. [/quote] Every post you've made can be summarized as "No, you are!" [e digicons]:grin:[/e]
[quote]YOu just dont get it. [/quote] Oh I get it alright. I just don't think this matters at all to my POINT. Just because the final UN paperwork wasn't ratified until a couple of months later doesn't mean that EVERYONE (except the Serbian scumbags) wasn't in agreement on what had to happen in Kosovo and who had to do it and when. They'd been debating this for YEARS as the serbs just kept killing. So the Spring came and...boom. Goodbye fascists. <p
[quote]Gore was never indicted. It has not been rectified.[/quote] Why would Gore be indicted for the Chinese sending an illegal check?! I could send YOU an illegal check and send you to jail that way then. The whole point of the Chinese issue was to improve the vetting of donations in ALL elections, which has been done - as we saw in this election. [quote] Source? Opinions do not need any, but you are stating a fact. So facts please. [/quote] Sources -
[quote]Yes. The two monitors do differ on XP, but not on Vista as I didn't add support for that on Vista.[/quote] KHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! or rather NEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIILLLLLLLLLLLLL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! [e digicons]:P[/e]
re: new Windowblinds [quote] Object Desktop 2009 includes a new version of WindowBlinds that lets users apply textures to their existing skins as well as well as providing explorer backgrounds.[/quote] I can't find a way to choose my own explorer background image, only the ones provided by default.
Installed first bootskin pro, ran into the no serial number issue. Before I could post that, there was a new version (thanks!) so I updated to it. Was now able to create a bootskin, but I'm unable to apply any of them, the defaults, or mine. :( Vista 64 Ultimate, and my boot drive is D: not the usual C:, bootskin pro v 1.00.027
Bravo! Note that I can't find BootSkin Pro in Impulse. Every other update seems to have come through fine. I'm running Vista 64U so is it not supported for that (yet) or am I missing something? (edit) Nevermind, it just showed up after rebooting from the other installs...curiouser and curiouser. [e digicons]:D[/e]
Interesting, so maybe just an oddity on my end. :) To change the page file, go to the same control panel as DEP but select the Advanced Tab. So go to Control Panel/System/Advanced System Settings/Settings/Advanced There is a settings for Virtual Memory button at the bottom. You will need to set the new paging file on another drive, then set no paging file to your original. Note that if there is no paging file on the root OS drive, you ca