sonaris: The removal of simple file sharing is to actually allow you to access the main Security dialog in the folder properties. If that still doesn't let you get to it, you're probably in XP Home, in which case you'll have to go into safe mode (reboot, keep pressing F8 before the XP boot logo) before it will allow you access. A picture of the dialog I'm talking about is here: http://www.windowsecurity.com/img/upl/wxpsec041026726482046.gif<
GreenReaper
sonaris : Check out the properties of the WindowBlinds folder. There should be a Security tab (if not, make sure simple file sharing is turned off in Tools/Folder options/View). Make sure that Everyone and Users have at least read access to the folder and subfolders. If not, add it.
Blurring is a pixel shader function. WindowBlinds cannot realistically implement this feature on XP without essentially reimplementing the Vista window handling and rendering system. You are more likely to see that sort of thing when Vista actually comes out, as the underlying composition engine will be more able to support it.
Umm, that's exactly how it's done now. The system icon went away because it was in wbload. It had to be recoded to work with the new methods used.
Just copy the skin folders out of Program Files\Stardock\Object Desktop\WindowBlinds and then uninstall. If they *do* disappear, you can always copy them back and then rebuild the skin library.
Yes, which is why he said "hasn't bought the program" (should have been haven't, but anyway . . .)
Because while it's tomorrow in China, it isn't tomorrow in the USA, where Stardock is.
I do not believe that Stardock has plans to suspend the use of activation in the future. The simple fact is that it does help reduce piracy - that is, it results in a statistically greater number of sales that cannot reasonably be attributed to any other factor (as Nakor pointed out on the linked thread). More sales means Stardock can devote more resources to adding features rather than releasing new versions to frustrate pirates . . . oh, and b
For those who might think fonts aren't news - consider how much time you spend reading things. How much would you be willing to spend for that to be even a few percent faster? It's your life, after all.
Sometimes you need it - where "it" is the skills acquired by dabbling. I have what could be charitably called "limited" art skills - but the technical knowledge of how to use an art program comes in useful every day, and is vital for understanding the needs of artists. Things like basic Paint Shop Pro and HTML/CSS knowledge are required to do things directly related to product development (creating reasonably attractive help manuals, for example).
Ziggystyles: Graduates should be training themselves in those tools, because if you're not interested enough to learn them on your own, you're probably not the sort of person a company is interested in hiring. There are plenty of opportunities for this. Microsoft is giving away development tools for free now. Even where that's not the case, there's usually stiffly discounted st
If you don't want your time, feel free to send it over. We'll need extra hours just to fit in all the things you guys want us to do!
Yes, I noticed that too. Alas, sometimes things take longer than expected, or other things become more important as time goes on. But it is coming.
I agree with Brad here - our artwork team really did themselves justice on the animations in the pet. Ambigouous9ine: You can read more about KeepSafe here and here .
Like it says: "These charges could include, but are not limited to: credit card processing fees, bandwidth, store fees, etc." I doubt they'd amount to much, considering the volume of business Stardock does with credit cards, but it would be nice to know exactly how much it was. My guess is that customary charges won't actually be more than credit card fees unless it starts getting sold in (offline) stores, or bandwidth gets vastly more expensive than it is today. <br/
Works fine for me, alpha-omega. Perhaps you just need a more recent version of Firefox - or a faster computer? There are a lot of people on there . . .
I do wonder when they'll start suing google for not being pro-active and having people who go through their search results looking for warez. Then again, maybe they do.
*grins* - I'm a sleeping norn , not a dragon - but don't worry about it.
Does Windows 95 count as a software bug? Several thousand of them, no doubt. But let's face it: All commercial software of any non-triviality has bugs. It is a simple fact that there is never enough time to fix them all and add the new features that people demand. The trick is balancing the two by fi
Less funny are the ones where people lost their lives, particularly the Therac-25 incident. I'd read about that before (and the more recent one with the blocking), but not the more detailed description of exactly how (and in how many ways) the Therac-25 failed. It just goes to show, software is complicated stuff - and greatly moreso nowadays than it was then. About the only people who get a
It's over, man. Let it go.
Internet fraud is real . . . but you're far more likely to get caught out by offline fraud, or just straight-out theft. I would be willing to bet that a lot more people can say they've had credit cards stolen in the mail than have been a victim of internet fraud.
pictoratus: The statistic you mention (Average Visit Time) is three minutes , not three seconds.