There is more to do, because more things can be skinned. As a result it is perhaps harder to make a good WB skin in a reasonable amount of time. This is unfortunate, but unavoidable if more things need skinning now then they used to. I would say that the overall expectation of quality has also risen, although there have always been good skins and not so good skins. Fortunately better tools have helped with this slightly, but there is no denyin
GreenReaper
Sounds like they're basically taking a certain configuration of Windows XP Embedded and rolling it out as a consumer (or business) product. Which isn't a bad idea, really. One size seldom fits all.
A skinnable browser superior to IE on a skinning site a top priority? Nah... Well, if they'd licensed DirectSkin , it might be a different matter . . .
Heh, yes, it's under warranty now - will it stil be in a few years time, though? Perhaps they expect to pick up a bit of extra work later . . . you have to ask why they don't just do it as standard. Could be it would just use more fuel than normal in that configuration.
All skins submitted become the property of PlanetAMD64. Authors will retain ownership of the designs but ALL submitted skins stays with us. This seems a little contradictory. Exactly what rights are being signed away? What are you going to do with the submitted skins? This needs to be made more clear. Frankly I think getting even good one WindowBlinds skin submitted is hard enough, let alone two. I would strongly advise you to
"If the wheel was flat to begin with, putting another flat on the rim wont solve your problem" Fortunately Stardock is in the business of selling wheel upgrades with flashy hub covers.
Yeah, but you know that the rich/tough kids are just going to buy tasers so they can bully the poor ones at school and steal their lunch money.
Looks very shiny - I doubt I'll be able to afford anything like that - heck, even the insurance would be crippling. Hope you're not planning any trips to Canada, though! I do find the legality of the K40 worrying, too. It seems like privilege in its most essential form - rich people can actually buy immunity from prosecution , just as if they'd bribed a witness to stay silent. For those who think it's their own car
Just because you say "yes, I agree to have my email scanned, and that information can be sent to someone else so they can send me ads" doesn't make it right - why would anyone want to sign away rights? Because you get something of value for it! I don't see how this is so hard to understand . .
It's not even that, Zoomba. Jafo appears to regard Google as a third party as much as the advertisers. It is a matter of trust. He does not trust google not to misuse emails or other personal information, to pass them out to other agencies. And yes, he's right, you have to trust google not to, or accept that they might if they felt it was appropriate. But there are many who do trust google, and who do not think that they would give it to the wrong peop
Guys, it's a contract. Gmail isn't saying that you don't have the right to privacy. It is saying that you do , and asking you to waive those rights in return for providing you the service. You don't have to . . . but then, they don't have to provide you the service. Honestly, I think you're being paranoid, Jafo. Their interest is in making money off advertising. The advertising is matched to your account through the use of keywords or ph
You do not have to login to the store, if you don't want to. It is mostly a convenience to allow you to not have to enter certain details again.
Yes, it has been thought of. It is not yet possible with WindowBlinds to do per-pixel alpha on window borders (or on the taskbar for that matter). You could use DesktopX to make the taskbar/start panel, and maybe you could do something with WindowFX "shadows", but the reality of translucent borders is not with us yet, I am afraid.
bl33k: I know of one colour problem in the Favorites menu for some older skins (text may appear black or overly bold). Stardock are currently working on a modification to fix that. It's not a huge problem, though.
It's getting closer . . . 83 now.
Sounds like the wcfiles.dll file didn't get updated properly. Have you tried rebooting, in case it needed that?
I think that inasmuch as it is bad for the company with no significant positive side then perhaps it would be best to make changes. For example, your posts on free software which so deftly linked fact and opinion were placed onto the TotalGaming website in the "Featured Articles" section. I feel that this was foolish, because most of the people who will be going there are teenagers or young "geeky" adults
I just checked - the Stardock/WinCustomize team has reached rank 1111 of 37130 with 15 active contributors, well within the top 5% of teams. Let's hope it's not too long until we get into the first thousand! If you're just reading this now, please join up and help out.
I'm not getting that here. What version of DX did you have before, if any? What version of Natural Desktop are you using - 1.20 or an earlier version?
In the future (read: probably not immediately ) we will be looking to provide the first option (and various other bits of info) directly via scripting. If you have the new DX beta, you may have noticed the new scriptable email plugin - this sort of thing could be extended to give access to most of the features now offered by the plugin. I've not been asked to work on
To be fair, I don't think health insurance is a bad thing - you really don't want programmers to come down with bugs, as they might introduce them into the source code.
A suggestion from a user who viewed this article (not me): Perhaps links to it and similar articles should be put somewhere in the documentation so people who just bought it or have it with OD get a better idea of what they can do with it.
People should note that the SkinWiki has moved - the old link in the articles will no longer work.
Done. Hope it is a success!
It's perhaps not so much "had to contract work out for monetary reasons" (I'm pretty sure Stardock has contracted work out to US people, too) as "the people who were doing the cool stuff were in Europe, so Stardock dealt with them". It's not like Stardock had fully-formed product specs that they sent out to prospective foreign programmers for the lowest quote - these are the original developers who came up with the ideas that Stardock is hiring. If you want to get into desktop customizati