Bakerstreet: Frankly, I'm not sure the point of your point. The firebombing of German cities IIRC inflicted more casualties than the A bombs on Japan. The particular horror of course was that the A bomb was a qualitatively different weapon with radiation and the consequences. And it was widely publicized. After the war, again IIRC, most Americans at least were not aware of the firebombing of Dresden and other cities and its results. As for who was working in the munitions plants and fa
sig101
Not everyone does believe that, Paxx. If it hadn't been for Sept 11 I doubt you'd see what support there is in the US for armed intervention elsewhere.
Grayhaze, the US didn't get UN approval for action in Bosnia and Kosovo. Kofi Annan didn't seem to have a problem with that then. Although the stated policy of pre-emption certainly gives other nations pause. And the US likely would have qualms about another nation adopting such a policy. North Korea, for example. The previous UN resolutions and peace terms for Iraq could be viewed as authorizing action against Iraq now. The UN inspectors recently found arms still laying around that ha
Lecrayon: where did you get your numbers? The count etimates vary, depending who is doing the counting and what they include, like postwar casualties. Also, the Gulf War lasted a little over a month. Not a few months.
Publications available on the Project for a New American Century website: http://www.newamericancentury.org/publicationsreports.htm
I'm not gung ho for war. I thought the Bush Administration made up its mind months ago to go forward on Iraq, going to the UN was an afterthought and that any outcome there wouldn't make much difference. But I don't recall even the Administration claiming that Iraq provided funding for Sept 11 or Bin Laden. If the Administration had any evidence of that, that would be the smoking gun that they would have loved to have. But they don't and that hasn't been the basis of the Administration
Just some info on what's currently available (where I am anyway): http://www.consumerenergycenter.org/vehicles/bestpick/default.php?ID=18
Congratulations!
Jafo, does ThemeXP have any site TOS? I don't seem to see one. (Of course, my ad/script blocking does eliminate some stuff from sites, but I'm not especially inclined to disable it for that site.) I just don't recall seeing anything that provides rules for what can or cannot be uploaded there. I don't see any disclaimer either, though. But as you say, disclaimers can be worthless, especially if there's no real TOS and advisories regarding acceptable, unacceptable or illegal content. Cl
Never had that happen with those apps. Fuzzy has a good suggestion. Just to be on the safe side, run an updated AV scan. Here's a free online antivirus scanner: http://www.pandasoftware.com/activescan/ There are some other free online AV scanners out there. McAfee used to have one, I haven't checked lately. Here's a write up from the Symantec site that comes up when googling for cmd32.exe: http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/data/w32.kwbot.c.worm.html It ce
In the comments section of the Melian's LOR Gondor WindowBlinds skin there is a link to a site with walls from movies. The wall used in Melian's preview is there on pg 8. Also walls are available at the LOR movie web site.
It's PixOS. > It's not only on ThemeXP's site but is also displayed on the site in the the comments: http://www.ftpdown.com/ so one can download it from ThemeXP.
My understanding is that SDCentral is compatible with W2K, XP and W98x. Install it (or CM) and the other stardock apps downloaded through it onto your hardrive. They have default locations to go to when they install. It'll set up the OD directory in "Programs" and all the apps like WB, etc will have their own folders in the OD directory. (You can then back them up to a fresh clean CD if you wish for backup purposes only.) Frankly, I'm not sure how you're using the CD you keep
The newsgroups are accessible to anyone. I cruised the newsgroups long before I became a Stardock customer. It's all done through your newsreader (presumably OE). So OD or CM should not have anything to do with that. I can't imagine how they would. When your subscription runs out, if you don't renew, you keep everything you already have. The apps (assuming you get them to work) will still function. All it means is that with an expired subscription to OD you won't be able to get new upgr
I put the link to the OD zapper in my previous post. Why reinstall from the CD when you've had problems with that in the past? All you have to do is download the CM from the site. They don't have access to your hard drive when you do that. You just download the file and install it to your drive. That's just what you're doing when you download programs through the CM. You do download the programs from the Stardock site through the CM, don't you? That's the whole purpose of the CM, reall
Paladin. Yup, that's BoXXi. Have eject button, will work from home.
Do you mean accessing the newsgroups in Outlook Express? Just using the link to them on Stardock should take you directly to the group and then you can subscribe in OE. You don't have to be a customer or anything to access them. Otherwise you should be able to set up an account in OE for news.stardock.com and then see the newsgroups on the server.
In CM user info is it showing your serial number or something else? What happens when you click on the "Update Configuration" button? It has your info and then changes to the expired license/user info? Other than waiting for a response from Stardock, I might be inclined to uninstall all OD stuff on the PC (backing up skins first so you don't lose those). Brian Hinson in the Stardock DX Newsgroup posted a link in January to a ODNT zapper that will clean everything out. (Someone was
That's very bizarre snd certainly not something I've ever experienced with OD on an old W98 machine and a new XP PC so something's out of whack. The programs themselves normally have worked ok for me even on old PC's although I've some people have had problems with the CM. Although nothing like someone else's registration showing up with a legit copy. At least, I haven't heard of that before. To clarify, you're having a problem with CM, WindowBlinds and Winstyles too? CM is just one way to down
Heh. Pretty cool, mattboy. Congrats on Sunfall.
Mary Jo, my DX problem happened after installing Toon XP. And the repair worked for me, FWIW. It just reinstalls DX on top of itself. What I did do is when it asked if you want to keep the newer versions of DX files, I said no. Thus restoring DX to the original installed version. After that DX worked and so did the Toon XP DX theme. That seemed counter intuitive to me, but it worked. But as I said it was the last formal release version of DX from last fall. Dunno about the later beta v
Just a tad. It skeered me.
Nidisa, I haven't had anything like those problems you're experiencing with WindowBlinds and IE on either W98 or XP. How does IE work if you're not using WB?
I had the same error message and finally decided to uninstall DX. But when I went to do that I noticed it had a repair option. So I used that and restored all original files for that version of DX (the last nonbeta release) since evidently there were newer versions in there. To my surprise it worked. Go figure. Don't know that it would be any help to anyone else but I thought I'd mention it anyway.