The HUD looks weird on some monitors, including mine. Focus on your game? It distracts me. It looks unfinished and really isn't needed. At least I know how to get rid of it, so I guess it doesn't really matter.
[quote who="LoTeK_83" reply="14" id="2282724"]The minimalist hud is good, no need to take it away for me. It let you see more of the game screen than the vanilla one, they could even implement it in my opinion. Way better. [/quote] Disagree.
You reply to a 16 day old thread to call me an asshole.
[e digicons]:drool:[/e]
DeltaAssault Yeah, the ui looks weird sometimes. Look back a page or two and Jason says how to revert to stock.
[quote who="Diplominator" reply="25" id="2280259"]So, um...The empire has the Venator...fine, I can see them keeping a few around for duty on the outer rim. It's a bit of a stretch, but I'll buy it. However, they should probably NOT have X- and B-Wings. Oops. Any idea what the Alliance might get instead of a Venator? A Bothan Assault Cruiser might be appropriate, since it's supposed to be a replacement for the Victory. Also, if you can
You can't.
[quote who="SpardaSon21" reply="22" id="2273272"]XQ is a bit too small. Its really just a hangar defense with a few turbolasers on it. [/quote] Yeah. And no Base Delta Zero persay, but the Imperator has crazy high bombing damage.
Rebels could get a different Golan variant. Say Empire gets Golan III and Alliance Golan II? If you do use the EAW one that would be fine, having the mesh expansions like the ones in EAW would be cool. XQ would also work.
Ack, not the eaw starbase! XQ=Better.
Sins Forums
Hmm, it looks like the uber starfish of doom wants to give my fleet a hug! Hi there! Hey, that's not ni..! [e digicons]:drool:[/e]
I would say yes to an XQ.
Argh. Somehow I was using the old dev exe[e digicons]:X[/e] . This thread was a product of me being stupid.
[quote who="death_runner" reply="3" id="2256762"]i have the real game it just might not have installed right. p.s dont jump to conclutions . [/quote] Fine. Try a reinstall. P.S. You spelled conclusions wrong.
[quote]Rnick... starbases require meshes, and doing major mesh/UV texturing is quite time consuming. I was thinking of using the XQ platform mesh from SOGE for the Alliance and planning on a daily prayer ritual that might materialize a Golan-2 platform mesh for the Empire. Do you think the XQ platform would be worth it for the Alliance?[/quote] which XQ? http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/XQ_Platform
Hmm, my pirate senses are tingling!
Bah, kinda buggy but nevermind. Its OK as it is. Im good with waiting for the toolset. /thread
removed by author
So, as a person looking to mod, I was happy to see developer.exe out. But then I noticed that the Forge Tools are out of date. Are we going see Forge Tools for this build?
Ha ha Luckmann and drugfreeboy. The modelling program.
Double Post
The Mod Tool is a free version of autodesk softimage, which is also known as XSI
Problems, Tips, Tricks, Rants, whatever, as long as it's about Blender, discuss it here.
Thanks. By the way, are the conversion errors show-stoppers or just annoying?
[quote]I suspect I'm going to have to bow to public pressure here and move the Venator over to the Empire. Enjoy it while it lasts, Alliance! As for Celestial Bodies... I've tested this and it works fine for me. I suspect you have the wrong order of mods. It should be (from top to bottom): 1) Requiem - Celestial, 2) Requiem, 3) Celestial Bodies v0.8b As for the interface... well I capitulated on the pure transparent, background-less approach and stuck with just changing