God you are so needy!
Haree78
Them Vasari all look alike to me.
JiggleBum Coalition, yes this is Haree here, I demand that you destroy Tescos Basics Armada now and I will give you a couple of Assailants in return. Tescos Basics? Yes it's your pal Haree, help me annihilate them backstabbing JiggleBum guys please, I've had enough of them, I'll throw you a few assailants in return. muhahahahahaa....muhahaHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHA.....HAHHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAAHAH!! *caugh**caugh* *ahem*
[quote who="N3rull" reply="156" id="2361913"]You do understand that a Kortul at level 10 with 3/3 power surge with all shield upgrades done receives only slightly above 18 shields per second while Power Surge is active? A level 1/3 Power Surge on a lvl 1 Kortul gives you => less than three shield points per second This ability is shit and Kortul is no better a tank than most other Vasari caps. It has 5 armor basic, yay.[/q
Hi Kitkun gonna comment on the Vasari caps, as I don't play other races hardly ever I will not try and get an overall buff or nerf but I've been crying out for them to be normalised because of the egg. So with that in mind I like your suggestions with the following changes personally: Kortul Power Surge: I think you are over buffing this, the Kortul already makes a fairly decent tank, I don't agree with the increased shield recharge but this ship deffinate
GOD DAMMIT LEO!!
As much as I'd love to order from Impulse I'd litterally be throwing away £10 to do so. I've got the hard copy preordered instead.
It's a nice idea mate, I would really be interested but I'm in the UK and my gaming time wouldn't sink with them times at all :S
Seriously guys, that's looking gorgeous.
Well let's see what the future brings. It's quite possible Ironclad will create a non micro expansion that includes Entrenchment and Diplomacy with features originally planned for the 3rd micro expansion and an upgrade for us micro purchasers. That way they can get retail sales and get more out of the top selling game.
[quote who="Hortz" reply="40" id="2358410"]Seriously, people on the internet just argue for the sake of arguing and being contrarians without a cause...[/quote] Wow.
[quote]He makes a great point, and I dont get people like you...dumbarse[/quote] I suspect making someone like you understand my post is waaaay beyond my abilities. But then my post wasn't written for people like you.
If you guys would stop feeding the troll he wouldn't be so bloody annoying.
Do you "own" your copy of sins? (don't be ashamed if you don't) YES Do you own entrenchment? YES Let say you were to divide you time between Vanilla and Entrenchment sins, what percentage of time do you play Vanilla or Entrenchment? 100% Entrenchment Roughly how many hours a day do you play Sins (either)(count mutliplayer also)? <span style="co
[quote]Haree, what settings are you running the game at? At highest texture options, the game eats a couple gigs of RAM within an hour jus in vanilla Entrenchment. Best thing to do is lower those by a notch. Reduces memory use by more than half. Centurian: I thought about playing online a while back, but decided to spite you instead. [/quote] I run maxed out se
[quote who="TheRezonator" reply="74" id="2351793"]ive heard of Sins being run on Chipsets with out any trouble... given, they were playing it on lowest of low quality everything... but it ran no problems... i, personally, never experience any such problems, even on full out, massive maps with multiple races and what not...[/quote] Hmmm I run on a 4GB machine with 32bit Vista. I have 8800M GTXs in SLI (in laptop so note the M), I've tried multiple driver
[quote who="CenturionJixra" reply="71" id="2351188"] Are you saying that it has something to with computer power? Perhaps with video cards having to handle textures for four different races?[/quote] Maybe I'm wrong, but I got the impression that currently with everything out we started to run out of memory to run the game, but there are mods out there that add races so perhaps it's possible. I always thought that the reason I start losing special effects end game, i
@EadTaes I wish you would be quite.
We pretty much deffinately will never see a 4th race unless either Sins goes 64 bit only or the game limits that only 3 of the 4 races can be in a game at a time. Neither is going to happen. @Annatar11 they already added in a 3rd race [e digicons]XD[/e]
Why are you asking Brad? Why are you writing in green? Why are you assuming all people don't care about single player when in fact they are the majority of Sins players? Why are you asking the question, admitting you don't know their motives and yet instantly claiming it to be the most stupid add-on they have made? I don't get people like you.
As a single player gamer I only play Entrenchment since buying Entrenchment. In all honesty I can't remember well enough to say if the AI was harder before the expansion. My experience is that I often see the AI do some really good defencive work on it's worlds, use of mines and starbases near the edge of Gravity Wells which ensures I take some losses if I rush in or if I have to retreat quickly. It maybe over defends, but I'm a turtler at heart so I can forgive it for tha
I don't get people who say it's not the best AI they've seen. I've played countless RTS and Sins is the best AI I have encountered. When you get experienced at the game, a couple of games, maybe more, the AI will start to need to stack odds in his favour to make a challenge such as stacking teams or higher difficulty levels that cheat. Par for the course with RTS though. As for cheating online I'm not a multiplayer player but a frequent forum user and
Poppycock.
Play are doing Sins for 9.99, I only noticed cause it was in the top 5 PC games.
Oh I see! Of course, I agree.