Volt_Cruelerz

Volt_Cruelerz

Joined Member # 3217355
15 Posts 1,085 Replies 25,320 Reputation

Let's say we moved Temple of Communion down to T1 for the AL and in its place in T2, give them a 5%/10% allegiance buff. Then make Fury of the Unity add some mitigation in culture lets say. That combined with some balance changes to abilities on capitals (Animosity, Guidance, Clairvoyance, etc) I think would make the AL much better off and on equal footing with the others.

43 Replies 39,644 Views

[quote who="GoaFan77" reply="7" id="3194414"]I think that might be a bit much, asking them to make a whole new entity just to globally apply buffs to players. I think a research modifier of "ApplyBuffToAllOwnedEntities" might be the best we get. [/quote] This is a wishlist, so...

30 Replies 27,309 Views

And some more instantActionTypes... ApplyBuffToPlayerOfOwner: applies a buff to the player that controls the object ApplyBuffToAllPlayers: does as suggests ApplyBuffTo[Structures|Ships|Starbases|Planets]OfPlayer: as suggests with a target cap which can be set to -1 And some new modifiers.. playerTaxRate: modifies player's tax income by a given amount playerTradeRate: does as suggests playerTradeLengthSet

30 Replies 27,309 Views

This is a goooooood thread... instantAction: max increased from 5 to 16 periodicAction: max increased from 2 to 4 (sorry Goa) buffInstantActionType: ApplyBuffToFirstSpawnerNoFilterNoRange: does as suggests ConvertPlanet : converts a planet to a specified planet type RemoveBuffOfType : change to work more than once. Right now

30 Replies 27,309 Views

It is pumping out more culture in a given amount of time. Standard culture techs simply increase culture spread rate. I believe the intent of this tech is to reduce the time it takes to reach the .07%/s from 0 by increasing the performance of each individual center.

9 Replies 8,070 Views

Maximum allegiance buffs would be nice changes for the AL and if they came early enough would help them out of the gate. Ironically I too have been thinking about Mass Communion acting as a source of income. Unfortunately there is no way to do it via an ability without it being untaxed which would be severely OP and is what has stopped me from doing it in RR.

43 Replies 39,644 Views

Checking the data files will bring up all sorts of codenames for things. Calling the Ankylon the Athena is confirmed in the buttons texture file but ATHENA was also on the side of the titan in the original texture when it was first released just as KOL is on the battleship. See here .

24 Replies 114,295 Views

It depends on whether or not you play MP. If you play MP, you'll notice them as you become more and more skilled. Balance between units at this point is actually some of the best its been in the history of the game. The Advent are underpowered and the Vasari are overpowered. As I said though, unless you jump into competitive multiplayer, this is pretty much a non-issue.

8 Replies 7,162 Views

[quote who="bilun" reply="11" id="3194317"]Also there's one very simple optimization of an advent Loyalist tech I'm sort of amazed hasn't happened yet: Assimilated Populace really should activate when a new world is acquired via Repossessions. At present the assimilated Populace buff only activates on traditionally colonized worlds and is lost when the ship bearing it phase jumps- the result is that the the damage buff on assimilated po

43 Replies 39,644 Views

[quote who="GoaFan77" reply="28" id="3194185"] Quoting XATHOS, reply 26If you ever actually run across somebody bragging about achievements in a game with no benefit, punch them. Hard. If there was an achievement for beating a Vicious AI with nothing but colony ships I'd say let the guy brag.[/quote] [e digicons]:rofl:[/e]

42 Replies 141,372 Views

[quote who="GoaFan77" reply="7" id="3194288"] Quoting jkmaster9918, reply 5The Vasari are really the Italian's descendants running from a basilisk painting? I noticed that too, but I figured it was just coincidence since I can't see any particular reason why they'd be named after him.[/quote] Likewise.

24 Replies 114,295 Views

I'm not familiar with all of the original names/codenames for things, but here are those that I know: Ankylon: Athena Ragnarov: Thor Coronata: Eidolo (IIRC) Eradica: Cherubim (IIRC) Discord: Cyhyraeth Vorastra: Charybdis Rankulas: Shathak-Ovigas As for other ships.. Well, the Advent are pretty straight-forward with most of theirs. As for the TEC.. Arcova: no idea Cobalt: no idea

24 Replies 114,295 Views

First off, all units need to have another integer variable attached to them. This is likely an easy change. Then, you need to figure out last-hits which the game does not currently do.* That's more complex but not hard. Then you have to display it. That means a change to the UI to accommodate a new variable and possibly even a new draw function. Because there appears to be some funkiness with buff chain tick rates (and possibly the tick rate

5 Replies 6,018 Views

[quote who="JuleTron" reply="100" id="3194019"]Reverie probably should not increase ability cool downs on enemy Titans and SBs because debuffing Titans is what the Discord's Lethargy ability is for, same with Detonate AM. [/quote] .. That's why I suggested a weapon cooldown... [quote who="Seleuceia" reply="101" id="3194028"]I'm I alone in thinking that buffing only a single frigate is rather...idk, lame...for a capital ship ability?[/quote] Replicate Forces

118 Replies 148,284 Views