Sins Forums
Making overseers turn faster or have a wider firing arc sounds very good.
Banned for caring about severe gramatical indifference on an internet forum.
Sins Forums
If the Vasari can get two Enforcers, then for the same cost the TEC can get two kodiaks AND a hoshiko. Reintegrion is inferior to Hoshi repair AND the enforcer cant shoot or move when using it. However, reintegration is still useful as it stacks with repair bays, repair cloud and reactive nanite armour. Some or all of these abilities combined make a powerful combo. Reintegration is not bad, bit it still needs a little love. The Enforcer also needs cheaper wave upgrades and hig
Some pretty good ideas here, but I don't like the ideas of not colonising planets, not having credits and having a frigate carrier. It is totally inconsistant with the rest of the game and contradicts the entire game philosophy of sins. Uniqueness is great but only if it make in-game sense. Population growth is not "breeding". Population growth is bring more people on the planet under your control, registering more individuals for taxation. Thats how one of the Stardock guys described
Sins Forums
I think the problem with the enforcer is not that its weapons have low cost efficiency. The problem is that they decided to give it hugely expensice weapon upgrades AND make it cost extra fleet supply on top of giving it weak weapons. That is clearly going overboard. Boosting its DPS to 22 would be good imo. It would have more cost effective guns, but won't be OP due to extra fleet supply cost. Moving the Wave cannon tech tree down a level would also help. A small boost in each of the
[quote]Fighters chew through HC's[/quote] Bombers kill HCs, not fighters. [quote]The Kanrack is far better in every way. Its range is greater by about 40%, it has better health, and it has phase missiles. Phase missiles are awesome.[/quote] The kanrak is less cost effective then the LRM and it has a shorter range. The javelis is the longest ranged LRM not the kanrak. [quote]Why would Defense Vessels do anything to LRMs? They take out SC...[/quote] Fl
<img src="ht
MP is a challenge completely unlike SP. I encourage you to play in MP, you will have much more fun! I love Entrenchment too, I wonder what IC has in store for us next?
RTS all the way! FPS battles are puny in comparison.
That was great!
Yes and yes. Entrenchment is definately worth the money. If you like Sins, then buy it.
Sins Forums
I like it. Maybe there should be more neutral structures that can be captured. Neutral frigate factory, neutral turret etc. Maybe in the next expansion?
[quote]there should be some sort of arbitrary point system applied to winning, losing, objectives achieved, damage caused and taken etc etc, so its easier to understand at a glance, rather than reading a mission report.[/quote] good point. [quote]Have a look at natural selection. They are working on a sequel using a new engine. Basically there is an Alien team, their is a builder class and other fighting classes - other than that quite a normal fps.<b
Sins Forums
[quote]If it could destroy Devastator, it should more than exceed the structural limitations of the turret mount.[/quote] You think about this film waaaaaaay too much. Speed alone is not what makes a weapon damaging, it is also acceleration and mass. Devastator was destroyed becauase the shell was travelling so fast. The railgun itself is EXTREMELY heavy so that it has very little backwards exceleration. Equal momentum to the shell but it travels much slower. This is t
I found space ponies twice. How many other people have maneges this?
Yeah, getting every ability upgrade at high rank would be good. Misusing abilites and so losing them sounds interesting. Online perhaps they should be detailed records. Not just "games won" and "games lost" but also popularity, damage done to enemies etc. For example, you might be severely outnumbered and whip the other guy for most of the match, but then you get swamped by sheer numbers and lose. This should be recorded. Rather the simple wins and loses, there should also a record of
Sins Forums
So do I. The part when Optimus ripped that Decepticon's head in half was some serious pwnage.
[quote]i wasnt thinking of this so much, i was thinking more like you can choose who plays as the RTS player and who plays as an FPS player.[/quote] I didn't mean over the course of a single match, I meant over a course of several skirmishes. Like a RPG element. The "choosing" system should be in quick matches. RPG style promotions etc would be in some sort of "Grand Campaign". I think both would be able to work. [quote]im not sure if upgrades should be finite and bestowed aut
Lots of really good ideas here. I like the diea that the FPS guy can contact the General and say "we need air support!" so that communication works both ways. [quote]and still manage to get a strategic objective done, the FPS player gains points (rank points, exp points, whatever kind of points i havent decided yet, some ideas would be appreciated though[/quote] I like this alot. [quote]you would have two profiles, one for when you play RTS and one for when you play FP
Sins Forums
[quote]well, depends on what you expect from such a movie. is an intelligent movie? hell no! does it explain everything? not exactly. are there inconsistancies? there are. but is it fun to watch? yes, quite so. it's really two hours of metal-trashing, action packed mindless fighting. if you expect much more than that, you'll probably be disappointed. btw, didn't see part 1, but I doubt that so much more would be explained there.[/quote] If you didn't see the first one, or i
Sins Forums
[quote]Subjugator and Subverters are on relatively equal footing, [/quote] Agreed. The Stilakus was overnerfed. It dies way too fast and Distortion Field is pathetic. Right now, the Vasari don't get any outstanding ships at all.
<p
Banned for having a *mildly* disturbing avatar.
[quote]My numbers are too high but when I see a Carrier Cap, I wanna see those SC swarm out like bats out of hell! I want them to be a critical part in a fleets SC, instead of a afterthought after massing a large number of Carrier Cruisers.[/quote] I agree. However, I think that 9 or 12 squads at level 10 would be best. It is still enough to make a significant difference. [quote]I think devs should make stationary strike crafts targetable by any weapons, regardless of the weap
Interesting idea. So the FPS player is given objectives by the RTS player? I'm not sure how this would work, but it would be fun if it did. Maybe the FPS player through promotions gets higher ranking and eventually becomes the RTS player: the General. MP maps would be huge with thousands of people on a single map and epically long skirmishes. (Lag would likely be terrible though.) The leader of the clan would be the RTS player and he commands the other guys on his team. This would giv