Gene, I hereby respectfully request that you leave me on your blacklist forever, as witnessed by all present. Gladly done.
Gene Nash
I looked it up. It's also a jewelers' abbreviation for "brilliant" when grading diamonds and such.
wtf does 'brill' mean? I thought that it was British slang for 'brilliant.'
OMG! Sir Peter and I are online at the same time! It must be that full moon causing people to comment to themselves on their own blogs again. Bwahahahahahaha. I fear he does genuinely believe I am the anti christ. Nothing that comes out of his bizarre little mind would surprise me. Well, it
Dear, Creator, Could you imagine me a little richer? Thanks you. Your figment, "Gene"
anticipating a purely logical response when analysing interpersonal communications among human beings is inconsistent with my experience. So you're obviously not a Scientologist. <img src="../images/smiles/joke.gif" border=0 ALIGN="absmidd
Possibly the opening proposition that Sir Peter = Gene Nash? You are correct there. Stop being right, it may be habit forming. Does that open the possibility of B.S. being right? Or does it still present a problem in that manh
Okay, class, what is wrong with this logic: manhole: Sir Peter = Gene Nash B.S.: manhole is wrong about Sir Peter B.S.: manhole is right about Gene Nash
Here's BS trolling another thread, trying to spread it to other blogs. He even rewrote the comment to include me once he saw it was a thread to which I'd responded. Reply By: BakerStreet Posted: Wednesday, May 25, 2005 The trouble is paying attention to trolls. I sometimes screw up and care too much about what
I don't know why everyone jumps on your case but gives a pass to that mocking imposter. Go figure.
You seem to miss the word TEMPORARILY. BakerStreet said to go ahead and blacklist him. "you could blacklist me, I guess..." I obliged. I'm moving the comments to where they won't be off-topic, not eliminating them. He'll be free to continue his insults there. His little flame fest will live on. And if you bothered to look, you'd find lots of unchecked dissent in my comments. Try this: <a href="http://randomthoughts.joeuser.
&*^@#&#%^%!!! BO WAS ROBBED!!!!! Kenny G ... David Hasselhoff ... Hall and Oates ... Carrie Underwood That's about right.
That's the worst he had for ya? hah! He once wrote an entire article about some ugly old witch that used to hassle innocent children in his neighborhood, and how happy they all were when she died. He compared this ugly old witch's behavior to mine, and was hoping I'd be banished at the time, for the cardinal sin of criticising a
P.S. BS, I've temporarily shut you up. I plan on moving your flame to a more appropriate thread later. Since you're too thick to get it, blinded by personal involvement as you are, let me explain. This is not an "I've been blacklisted!" article. I'm sure manblow has had me blacklisted for the better part of a year. He can't take any kind of disagreement -- which is cowardly. His behavior here proves that i
his little experiment doesnt seem to be going so well. That's was an easy one to predict. I'm reminded of what Brad said after he banned someone else: "He wasn't popular, just prolific."
I haven't seen manopeace say or do anything that promotes the list of insults you have above. Gee, you never noted it so it never happened. What an intelligent position. I believe I could substantiate all those accurate descriptions with his own words and actions here. (With the possible
Just curious. What do you have against each other? On my side -- I honestly belief my laundry list of negative things I think about him. On his side -- he honestly thinks I am Sir Peter Maxwell, whom he passionately hates. (Either as me creating SPM or SPM creating me as a "fake supporter.")
Let me make it clearer for you, Baker. 1) Moron A posts an article asking people what they think of him, but only allows comments from those he expects will give him a favorable notice. 2) I point out the frivolity of Moron A's deceitful poll: he will only get praise. 3) I do exactly what was asked: give my opinion. What is your problem?
By: MasonM Posted: Wednesday, May 25, 2005 Mano, I've always respected the fact that you refrain from attacking others and seem to be quite fair minded. LMFAO! Wh
It would also be helpful to ignore the fact that the last time you engaged in a threat to leave JU unless certain bloggers were banished that you had all of 2 people willing to do the same. I'd like to see a limit to the number of times someone can call for other bloggers to be banned before getting b
Oh, and since you asked... I think you are... ...odd ...humourless ...self-righteous ...a liar ...a dickwad ...someone who needs to get a life ...stupid beyond belief. ...a coward ...a fake ...intolerant ...hypocritical ...the most hateful person on JU (dabe not excluded) ...someone who definitely needs to GO AWAY. You do nothing but post non-sequitur filled inanitie
How to get nothing but praise in 3 easy steps. 1) Blacklist everyone who might remotely disagree with you. (Surf other sites and forums looking for haters, just to make sure you don't miss anybody.) * Also remember, ANONYMOUS USERS ARE EVIL and must not be allowed to speak. 2) Now that it is safe, post a self-serving article asking what people really thi
That person should GET A LIFE! Maybe his grandson isn't brain damaged and could serve as a humour detector? He could read aloud to the child, and if the child smiles, he'd know not to take it seriously. Or the kid has gas.
I just wanna know what kind of wine to serve with "human beans." Dr Lecter recomments Chianti, of course, but I'd like something a little earthier. Why does wine have to be "white" or "red"? This was obviously started by those racist, filthy, intolerant Frenchies. Those Frogs are just the kind
I will be there it cover myself in his message. That's what I like about you; you're not afraid to wade into great issues.