We all got the joke... I laughed my ass off too... at the first one... the second one was funny, the third I started to get worried, the next five I just started deleting them... see, moderation still lives...
DavidK
Now it's just rehashed,cliched, junk. The "finest selection of wallpapers on the net" has become the "10% finest, 90% garbagest selection on the net". give me a break... this is not productiv
On the top menu, the button for "Edit Account" takes you to your profile page. On the left side about halfway down you should have this "Max # of Skins per Page" with a drop-down list. Right under that should be the Ratings with a drop-down list. Maybe this and the edit button are only available to level 4 members and if so, sorry for the confusion. I've never been told that was the case though, I thought every signed up member had the ratings settings.
why would we do that? btw - I'm an admin...
His site is down now. I noticed he had one of mine too but I don't mind, he can keep it up there. I agree to do be partner with eem... is ezier than ze couriel:) Thanks for letting us know he's a normal guy honz (even if he is French )
There's no wallpaper with that name in your uploads (including ones that aren't posted). Could you re-send it? with a name like that it should be easy to spot. It's not a "joke" wall is it? I don't see how it could disappear unless you or a moderator removed it.
macrobaye - what's the name of the wall that dissapeared? I don't see one in your stats with a low rating.
It's gone now. Posting it was my fault, I thought it was a picture he took of someone he knew. Silly me... Before people start running around the wallpaper section giving "1's" to all the "bad" wallpapers think about this, is it really a problem you need to take personally? I'd be willing to bet that the ones you'd object to are already being posted with a pretty low rating. A few other sites have no moderation. We're still moderating, just not as tough. We give you a filter
I actually have that wallpaper on my desktop right now. Made it pretty obvious which piece you meant. I need to have a talk with LeBBer... >
The images are identical, thanks for bringing this forward uberzev. I've pulled the piece and emailed the artist for an explanation.
China! /me wants to be in films now
despicable moderator... since I do this more than my 'day job' which is freelance graphics (aka: starving artist)
I deleted the comment with the warez site in it. The rest of it is just too sad, 2 lonely kids having a conversation. If anyone notices any more warez site recomendations or links let us know so we can deal with it. thanks and... listen to David Mandle
The more people who rate skins, the more meaningful ratings become. If anyone thinks a skin has gotten a malicious rating they should email an admin to look into it.
Shells Styles are a WindowsXP feature. If you're using Win2k you won't see the extra goodies. Those features are built into WB4.0 and WinXP only.
I think the record industry would say if you own the record, but have no turntable, you should buy the CD. The law however would allow you to record CD's of your records, or make tapes of them. As far as downloading goes, why would it be any different? You've already paid the label's royalties for the album's content by buying the record. Interesting question...
I've got about 4Gb of mp3's on my desktop system. All but about 30 songs are from my records and CD's that I ripped for my own use. They're all legal (except maybe the 30 or so that came from friends or my son). When Napster was happening I tried it and downloaded a bunch of songs from someone I had just seen in concert, Sarah McLachlan, and the quality of the rips was terrible. I went out and bought 3 of her CD's plus a couple other CD's of artists I had downloaded some samples of. I
Maybe the people just have to show the judge that they actually do own the records maybe... but it will be very expensive lawyer that shows them to the judge, not a "people". Once you are in court defending yourself against a $100,000+ lawsuit, you are screwed finacially. It's like getting cancer but your health insurance doesn't cover it.
It's the weekend, maybe they will take a little time to get to it. They're usually very good about removing rips when notified. Posting a comment probably won't get any action but emailing the admins most likely will. I left a comment too... can't stand rippers...
got it... thanks EH the tip is greatly appreciated. I never saw the first one, I'm glad you were aware of it. I'm really liked that piece, it was very well done and creative. I even bumped the rating, I was appalled at the rating it was posted with (2). oh well, at least now we know who did the original and I can download it from him
Here's the text Mike posted at DeviantART: Due to financial difficulties, DeskMod has closed it's doors for a temporary, but indefinite amount of time. Read on for more. At midnight central daylight time, DeskMod closed its doors to the public due to financial strain. We will be re-opening in the future, but for the longevity of the site in general, as well as for our own well-being, David Gorman and myself have decided to halt site operation for the time being.
Bandwidth Used: ~7.7 TERRABYTES wow - sounds like the kind of bandwidth you'd expect a NASA Mars mission to need...
this situation is new to any and all of us and needs some hard thinking. Exactly. What it doesn't need is a knee-jerk reaction from legislators who are too eager to please any corporate interest with enough lobbying funds. <TD class="mb-Body-Quote-
a couple more gems from Janis' heartfelt, well researched and extremely informed commentary (she's an artist with 37 years of experience with the record companies and 10 Grammy nominations) "There is zero evidence that material available for free online downloading is financially harming anyone. In fact, most of the hard evidence is to the contrary. It's absurd for us, as artists, to sanction - or countenance - the shutting down of something like this. It's sheer stupi