Amen to that. Shame we have to be so careful with apps (originally) intended to protect/help us.
Daiwa
[quote who="Krazikarl" reply="42" id="3611828"] Eh, not really. [/quote] I defer to the source. [e digicons];)[/e]
Save yourself the headache of ODM and just go to your MyAccount page at store.stardock.com - all your apps are there for download. Not really a HA, but ODM is wonky for some people for obscure reasons. ODM is nice when it works but not necessary to obtain & enjoy your Object Desktop apps.
I think Krazikarl has it figured out. Thanks to that insight, I can see how none of the SW movies were intended as stand-alone, self-contained films in the traditional sense. They have been the focal point of a vast social/business structure that has been unbelievably successful; the hooks, if you will. They are just the biggest pieces of the fabric of what has been the SW phenomenon. Viewed that way, Lucas is even more of a genius than we thought.
We looked a bit odd back then, didn't we? RIP Stevie.
Hey, Neil. You're closed. Musta missed the memo. [e digicons];)[/e] See ya next year. Have a Happy New Year!
[quote who="Jafo" reply="28" id="3611259"] At least that's got Sigourney Weaver in it.... [/quote] Her zipper was the best running gag in the movie. Well, it didn't make me gag, actually. [e digicons]:grin:[/e]
Galaxy Quest - that's more to my taste. [e digicons]:grin:[/e]
Took my son to see the original in 1977 at age 3 (nearer 4 as I recall). He's been a total Star Wars junkie ever since, seen every film, watch all the related stuff (Clone Wars, etc.), has tons of SW crap. He saw Force Awakens with his younger brother and, as they described it, they weren't high-fivin each other on the way out. Thought it was a 'good movie' but no raves.
Maybe... WEATHER??!!
From a comment at the Daily Wire on this article: http://www.dailywire.com/news/2071/most-comprehensive-assault-global-warming-ever-mike-van-biezen The Arctic Ocean is warming up, icebergs are becoming scarcer and in some places the seals are finding the water too hot, according to a report to the Commer
Something's always 'wrong with the weather' somewhere. Not really a good way to judge something running on a millennial scale.
I suspect those who already purchased it that way have been 'grandfathered in' but I don't think you can sign up for it de novo now.
http://denver.cbslocal.com/2015/12/21/colorado-weather-station-hits-51f-ties-one-of-coldest-temperatures-ever-recorded/ Not to worry... It'll be 'adjusted'.
?? Seems those are follow-ons about education. What did I miss?
ID is being diplomatic, as he should. It appears the monthly rental option didn't work out as hoped and was quietly retired. I've always felt the annual subscription is the best choice, in any event.
Very few true universities still exist. Most are now monoversities, centers of lower learning.
What's been going on at so many college campuses the past several years is a massive indictment of the federal Department of Education. It should be shut down, lock, stock & barrel, & every penny of its budget returned to the states. Our children have received absolutely no benefit form its existence, in fact have been harmed by it. Long past time for it to go.
You and your fellow Ozzies can have whatever constitution or rules you want, Paul. Likewise, so can we 'Mericans. Yours is irrelevant to me; mine to you, apparently. But it's existence is something that should be cherished by every person on the planet. As long as we're here, I have no idea why you Ozzies remain in the Commonwealth. It, too, is irrelevant, by your definition. And I agree with Doc's point about how our education system, p
[quote who="LightStar" reply="18" id="3608522"] According to Neil, that is not possible Andy. [/quote] I think he's referring to what might be doable with updates to Start10, not the native Win10 start menu (the one Neil reports is not theme aware).
Looks like DBAN and OS re-install would be an option. Perhaps the only one at present. Such a purveyor of Holiday Cheer you are, Doc. [e digicons]XD[/e] [e digicons]:*[/e]
[e digicons]:rofl:[/e]
I object, Uvah - they both inject humor into an otherwise banal world. Leave the poor AGW thread alone. [e digicons]:grin:[/e]
The universe of possibilities based on unproven theory, speculation, correlation, association and imagination is infinite. The universe of possibilities based on facts and (un-doctored) evidence is rather more discrete and finite.
WTF does "morality" have to do with science? Somehow, it is "immoral" to allow those who reject the evidence of AGW a voice? Some messed up absence of thinkin' & logic there.