/me grins in an evil manner Maybe you should go and rate Brad's stuff down without posting comments and see if the system improves in accountability?
GreenReaper
It does exist. I'm actually a 1.x registered user, so it comes in my serial updates (people love to take my address and use it in the serial mailer for some reason). If you're a registered user, that's how to get it. If not, I don't think Stardock are distributing shareware versions of it considering *3*.3 is out. I suspect it doesn't actually use less memory - it just means that the (greater) memor
Scrolling that up and down gives me a headache . . .
Firewall software can often be a problem. Also check that your virus checker is not checking all files - if it checks all accesses to WB files, it'll be slow.
I understood it, but then I hang out in #stardock IRC. It's things like being there to comment on skins, talk about skinning in general as well as ask a series of questions - it's easier to have a dialogue in chat than it is on the boards, because it's more instant.
Yeah, I get discouraged from using them because my pop-up killer kills them. *g*
It's a good thing, overall. I'm sure of it. The best prior example of this situation I can think of is books. It used to be that each book had to be painstakingly drawn with meticulous detail by monks. If you wanted a nice illustrated copy of the Bible, you'd better get your order in - it'd take a year to arrive, and you'd probably have to pay through the nose for it, too. Then, along came the printing press. Suddenly books were, if not free, available to anyone with a moderate effort. The rest
Usually, the last RC available on the CM is the shareware/registered build - that's why it's a release candidate; if nothing goes too wrong, it becomes a release.
Jafo: Then you have the uncomfortable situation of thinking everyone's either right or wrong. :-\
I think the Thinking/Feeling personality divide might be coming up here. Company CEO's are about the best example of Thinking - highly logical, reasoning. Most computer scientists test out as this type, too. Artists tend towards the Feeling side (although it's not as strong a correlation) - they're more willing to go on their feelings than logic or "proof" - appearance is very important. You might be able to get them to accept benchmarks as true, but they probably wouldn't base their judgement o
*notes that WinCustomize is effectively Brad's bookmark page*
Hmm. Well, that shouldn't be happening. All I can suggest is try 3.3, and if that doesn't help, make a bug report on the newsgroups or to [email protected]. Similarly for ObjectBar (might want to wait a week or so until a new shareware version comes out).
98, even SE, is screwed up enough that even with the most stable drivers in the world things are going to crash. Litestep is totally different and does different things. I can't really comment on it's stability as I haven't significantly used it.
Incidentally, if you like WB, you can comment at http://download.com.com/3000-2326-10104607.html - it makes a big difference. Of course, if you don't like WB you can comment there as well. *g*
Maybe you should just go with saying "faster" rather than "twice as fast", then. More reliably true.
SkinBench does need a bit of work, as indicated in it's version number. And some of the tests are blatently incorrect. Part of this is due to me doing timing incorrectly, which will be fixed. I have had a few bugs reported which I unfortunately can't reproduce. Yes, the edit sizing thing is strange, and no, I have no idea why it happens. I tried adding menu stuff a while back but wasn't able to get them to open etc under program control (if anyone knows how to do this, I'd be glad to hear). I ag
As DavidK says, you need to change the WB skin. Open the Sage UIS file up in SkinStudio and go to the XP Desktop/Taskbar/Clock section (or add it if not present). You then need to set it to use one of the defined fonts, or to make a new font setting and use that (WB uses font sections to set fonts - if you say "for this, use font 4" it looks for the settings in a [font4] section).
DavidK: SkinBench is at http://sourceforge.net/projects/skinbench/ if you want to try it out.
Yeah, and £. And € for the European division (after all, #stardock sometimes has more Europeans than USAians .
---GreeReaper: there is no big point in the PNG format without the 8 bits alpha channel it supports, which even IE 6 can't handle, as Crae said.--- Erm, no point in a significant decrease in file size? It cuts some of my files to *half* their size as GIF's. Most of the world still uses a 56k to access the net, and the faster a site loads the better. I don't need the advanced features - I just want better compression, which it does very well.
Yay AJ! Happy Birthday! *g*
The problem with things occuring on shutdown (and some photoshop stuff and toolbar blackness) should be fixed with 3.3c on ODNT now.
I'd say PNG is ready for the big-time. I use it on my site as a replacement for GIF. Windows 98 can view PNG's in IE 4 out of the box, so really there's no real reason to avoid it, and it could mean the difference between a user staying at your site or leaving.
Yay to everyone! Well done to all skinners . . . and to the judges who had to churn through all the submissions! ;-)
That's WebBlinds 1.00c, not WindowBlinds.