qrtxian

qrtxian

Joined Member # 4042583
1 Posts 47 Replies 22,368 Reputation

Prelude: The early hyperdrive era By the time the Arcean probe was detected in 2117, the millennia-long struggle between various Terran nation-states was finally at end. No war had occurred for several decades, and while not yet fully united, the various great powers ( link to a list of significant Terran political entities) had grown into a global meta-civilization. The discovery of the probe near the system’s asteroid belt wou

40 Replies 133,329 Views

[quote who="devxx" reply="4" id="2719825"] no such thing as a crappy planet guess it's all relative. at higher difficulty settings maybe good planets are scarce so you want to hang on to anything you can get whereas down where us newbies play, PQ9's and 10's are a dime a dozen. i have the techs, i just don't want to spend the time and money to improve them when there's a PQ9 right next door... a couple more questions about solderi

7 Replies 5,586 Views

1. Your soldiers comprise the new population of the planet after you invade it. The game (rather unrealistically) represents planetary invasions as involving the complete annihilation of the previous inhabitants, at least as long as you don't use Information Warfare. One transport remains after an invasion for every 1000 legions ("troops" as most call them) that survive; all others are lost. From what you've said, it sounds as if less then 1000 legions survived and all your trans

7 Replies 5,586 Views

As far as I know the reason for this bug has never been discovered, unlike the one on "Apocalypse", and so there's no known 'fix'. If you want to beat the mission, play it on the original Dread Lords. If you just want to get the final mission ending, open the GC2scenario file and read the "Victory" message.

8 Replies 5,304 Views

[quote who="Moosetek13" reply="4" id="2715395"]Just curious, why are running the game at 1024 x 768 when your native resolution is 1680 x 1050? Not only is it well below the res you should be running, it is also a different aspect ratio. That has been known to cause problems - sometimes major and random problems - with many video drivers. You should set the game to run at 1680 x 1050. You will find it a more pleasing resolution for the game, and it might even fix some of

6 Replies 4,829 Views

An update: As this was done with the Ultimate Edition, I tried loading the scenarios from DA. This did not produce a CTD, but something is still wrong, as the scenario's diplomatic settings aren't working. For instance, the one in the debug file above ("Mano y Roboto") was a Terran/Yor one-on-one duel. When starting the scenario, I should be at war with the Yor, but I wasn't. The same holds for other scenarios I tested on DA. Again, scenarios created through editing the xml di

6 Replies 4,829 Views

[quote]It's a lot more complicated with separate Tech trees for each race but to the best of my knowledge Twilight has the fewest bugs and has reasonable gameplay. My problem is that I really haven't played Twilight myself and so my knowledge of it is limited. Between Dread Lords and Dark Avatar I would probably have to go with Dread Lords. There was a huge nerfage of ship speed done in Dark Avatar based on the mistaken assumption that ship speed was being exploited to overrun the

8 Replies 9,022 Views

Similiar question - where do you save a custom scenario? I've experienced CTDs every time I try to start a scenario created with the TOA editor and I wonder if there may be a connection. I created a few custom scenarios for the original DL by directly editing the xml and saved them as a mod - do I do the same thing?

2 Replies 2,364 Views

Sorry to all readers for the lack of posts - I thought the AAR forums had finally given up the ghost and stopped writing this. Since there may be some life in the forum yet, I'll have the next few posts up soon (and this time, I mean it).

40 Replies 133,329 Views

[quote]It's a huge shame, because GalCiv II is an awesome game that feels like it was never really finished. For a while, the dev team did an admirable job of post-release support, but unfortunately the patches stopped before some of the nastier bugs were taken care of (late-game memory issues, races randomly deciding not to expand, broken diplomacy, etc).[/quote] Change "GalCiv II" to TOA and your statement matches my experience. I've almost never experienced bugs with DA or the orig

8 Replies 11,866 Views

[quote who="Zarnick" reply="5" id="2693328"] Sensors on starbases usually do a lot for me. I put sensors on my space miners then position them when they are not building on asteroids; and I have sensors on constructors which wait near my resources ready to make optimal starbase-weapons upgrades. [/quote] I put sensors on my freighters. Typically, I'll already have high-level sensors by the time I have one of the "advanced" trade techs researched

12 Replies 13,953 Views

[quote who="IztokBitenc" reply="2" id="2705646"]Hi! IIRC with the MAxCPU set, AIs (re)design ships more often, not only once a year. BR, Iztok [/quote] I always play with this setting enabled, but on one instance I forgot. The AIs still redesigned their ships more than once a year, although they didn't upgrade existing ships to the new designs that I saw.

3 Replies 4,764 Views

My favorite setting is to put habitable planets to "occasional", enable blind exploration and mega events, and set everything else to random. I never know what to expect in games like this, and it forces me to think on my feet. There can be occasional ugly results, like 9 AIs on a tiny galaxy, but even those can lead to some of my most epic games. Basically, the less I know about my galaxy before I play it, the better.

28 Replies 46,492 Views

There is no book, but I suspect there's still a massive amount of unpublished backstory. Maybe if the Elemental novel does well we'll see a book for GalCiv III if/when it comes out.

8 Replies 9,503 Views

There are many, many threads discussing this scenario, as well as a few of the other more difficult campaign missions. Unfortunately I haven't actually played the campaigns much, so I can't provide information on how to beat this mission, and the forum search feature is pretty awful... so you might just have to look for those threads randomly. Some general anti-Dread Lord advice from my experience fighting them in sandbox mode: If you focus on intercepting their transports, the DLs wo

14 Replies 17,229 Views

To update this post, now that I've played several DA games I can say that the evil races are not weak at all. The Drengin have been a power in every game they've been in and I've just had my first experience with successful Korath. The Yor still seem to do poorly, though. Their miniaturization bonus lets them build fairly impressive ships, but they never seem to develop the economic base to build many of them. In contrast, the Drengin in my current game have literally hundreds of ships - seve

15 Replies 13,056 Views

I would like to say that in my games, I generally feel there aren't enough ships to be 'realistic'. Except for certain AIs like the Torians who favor small and tiny hulls, I have almost never encountered a race with more then about 200 individual ships, even in full-tech games. I'm curious about your settings; what game is this (DA, TOA, original GalCivII) and what's the difficulty level?

2 Replies 2,627 Views

Excellent post, mambaman! Despite what you have said in the past, your battle scenes are thrilling, and this was no exception. Good to see the war against the Torians taking a turn for the better for once. Out of curiosity, how far ahead of events in the story is your game? You mentioned before that that the Drengin were favoring you against the Torians, and here we learn that they're donating ships. Is this a "true" AAR written after the game, or are events still ongoing? BTW

95 Replies 220,023 Views