ParagonRenegade

ParagonRenegade

Joined Member # 4933384
22 Posts 390 Replies 765 Reputation

Hello, long time no see. Guess development has left the "leave us hanging perpetually" stage and entered the "getting shit done" stage? I made a post "informing" someone of the game on the steam forums which was evidently completely wrong/incomplete/ambiguous. Someone also evidently thought I was a developer, so there's that. This was based on my own lack of understanding of the game's current and future state, and for that I would like to apologize to that person and the devs

0 Replies 24,059 Views

Repost of what I said in another thread; [quote]The population pressure is far too heavy as-is. It should be lowered greatly. It was excusable, barely, in GC2 where approval was just a pop growth modifier and the number of people you had on a planet was largely irrelevant to production, but now that population is the determining factor punishing us for having too much so excessively is really pushing it.[/quote] I would suggest lowering the malus incurred from having m

2 Replies 16,805 Views

The population pressure is far too heavy as-is. It should be lowered greatly. It was excusable, barely, in GC2 where approval was just a pop growth modifier and the number of people you had on a planet was largely irrelevant to production, but now that population is the determining factor punishing us for having too much so excessively is really pushing it.

9 Replies 13,449 Views

GLORIOUS. I had thought the "130 AI on a big-ass map" was just some idle boasting, I'm so happy to see I was wrong. I'm looking forwards to this very much! Also, owning the highest-rated steam review, I may just change my score to "recommended" :3

71 Replies 270,901 Views

[quote who="joeball123" reply="13" id="3476893"] [/quote] One thing; Moving diagonally on a square grid as opposed to a hexagonal one gives the unit in question more effective movement than one who travels in the direction of the faces of the square. This is an "exploit" of the game's hardcoded limitations, and it gives the player who abuses this quite an advantage. Everything else is just gravy really. Also, I think it looks cooler with Hexagons :3

119 Replies 404,343 Views

Simple error, required exiting to desktop with Control + Alt + Delete. Planet screen doesn't allow for you to exit, either through the regular "done" button or the escape key. Occasionally pressing escape brought me to the shipyard screen for a moment. Unfortunately there wasn't a crash, so I can't provide a crash report, so this is just a heads up! :D

0 Replies 2,510 Views

[quote who="EleventhStar" reply="20" id="3474339"] wait, first you wanted to merely make the planet uninhabitable by destroying the surface and burning off the atmosphere, now you want to liquefy the entire thing? big difference in how determined you are there man. Liquefaction seems a interesting concept, as it would require close to the amount of energy needed to blow up the planet, but delivered over a much longer period of time. Is it even possible

30 Replies 124,669 Views

[quote who="Larsenex" reply="18" id="3474326"] (System Message): Congratulations you Evil Tyrant, you have managed to take a Class 25 Paradise with a 16 Billion population of Gentle-Peace loving Altarians and reduced it to a glowing ember. Planet class 0: Uninhabitable/Non-terraformable. Star system warning: All ships moving through this area for 1 parsec will have speed reduced by 50% and combat effectiveness reduced by 20% due to

30 Replies 124,669 Views

[quote who="EleventhStar" reply="15" id="3474313"] Quoting ParagonRenegade, reply 14 Will there be planetary bombardment? Not the lame kind in Galactic Civilizations 2, but the full, balls-to-the-wall "let's turn this place into a glass parking lot" kind. -80% to planet quality not good enough to satisfy your malevolent urges? [/quote] Nothing short of total genocide my frie

30 Replies 124,669 Views

[quote who="Gaunathor" reply="9" id="3474087"] I found it. It's on page 27 (Planets and Colonies): "Tiles with yellow borders require certain technologies before they're available for use, at which point their borders will turn orange." No wonder I couldn't remember this. It's been over eight years since I've read the original manual. Still, I know that manuals can become quickly outdated once patches get released, but that line wasn't even true w

10 Replies 13,928 Views

[quote who="Gaunathor" reply="6" id="3474047"] Must have been in the beta, because I don't remember anything like that from the release version. Or did you perhaps mean that, once you've finished researching Soil Enhancement, the orange Habitat Improvement tiles appeared on your planets? [/quote] I dug out my old GC2 manual and found the passage I was referring to, paraphrased (I lost it again lol); "Certain technologies are capable of taking y

10 Replies 13,928 Views

[quote who="EleventhStar" reply="5" id="3472826"] wonder if the engine can support other map shapes then hexagonal, specifically long but narrow rectangles, for this idea to work better.[/quote] It can; you'll be able to set parameters for map sizes this time around :D

12 Replies 25,461 Views

[quote who="joeball123" reply="3" id="3473911"] To be perfectly honest, I would rather not have the Arid tiles turn green when the right terraforming tech is researched. Why? Because they provide a bonus to research improvements built upon them, and if they turn green when I research the right terraforming tech I have to click through all the tiles to find these, just like with all the other tiles that have bonuses. I really wish they'd color-code all the tiles that have any kind of

10 Replies 13,928 Views

Glad to see you recognize the problem. [quote who="perigrine23" reply="33" id="3473856"] The US is a civilization founded on liberty and freedom with slavery written into the constitution. Having conflicting or even contradictory ideology does not necessarily destroy a civilization. There are many other examples past and present, but this is among the most clear. As to the power of climbing multiple trees, you are making some big assumptions about what the power balance will be l

36 Replies 143,255 Views