Quesocito

[quote who="Ticktoc" reply="14" id="3663449"]As I kind of explained on Steam, that is not going to happen. I guess you have not followed other RTS games before but balancing can be a long process. There are a lot of things to consider and not everyone will agree on everything. With all the new content from Escalation balancing coming to the fore again is natural. I certainly agree they can be very slow with changes coming through though, and some explanation behind the changes would be apprec

ah thats great! Another Christmas :D :D mega cool!

[quote who="TAG_Utter" reply="10" id="3663376"]I think i wasnt the only that get confused.... [/quote] yeah i was also wondering on that one due to the typos (double negatives).. so u were certainly not alone :) [quote who="Ticktoc" reply="6" id="3663362"]It can't. That was an issue when Maulers and to a slightly lesser extent Athenas, tore through everything, units, T3 and buildings. Now they can only use their secondary fire vs buildings. [/quote] i thi

[quote who="Never123" reply="3" id="3663326"] you still don´t tackle the imbalance and problems Its like dasunding told me on a call. Most of the time, it is more balance before the patch than after. its always the same... [/quote] i gotta agree on this one. we still have the issues that irritated people the most about the cronus and artemis (that they moved away just as fast as advancing units, while firing on them) so the balance was to weaken t

(Looking past the fact that stationary Artillery and strategic bombers are OP.) The current unit meta is arguably focused around "tanks" - Athena and Mauler. Even if the Athena is nerfed. I think the units are still quite too similar to one another. So Im suggesting a broad balance change on all units to allow a greater focus on diverse usage of units, as opposed to blobs of units that nobody really uses the advantage of one over the other. I think the recent nerf to the Artemis ju

[quote who="Never123" reply="5" id="3663252"] Quesocito its even worse. On some maps just one of both players is able to capture both deposites without using orbital turrets... that is a little part of the imblance that stardocks ignore [/quote] wow! thats mad! thanks for the info!! so i guess ranked is even more of a dice roll than i thought XD

[quote who="godshand13" reply="3" id="3663221"]Thanks guys! I thought is was just me. It does seem like units not firing on structures is a wonky fix. I guess giving either the structures or the units specials rules gums up the processing. Still I would rather see a diminished attack value against structures that them not fire. I knew about the SS units sitting around when out of power. I don't mind that. I would be nice though if there was a UI indicator that

[quote who="deutschlandUberalles" reply="1" id="3663239"]almost all, and its fairly clear when you cant, and also some starting positions on the same map can and some cant go dubble. [/quote] hahaha thanks bro i really like the "and its fairly clear when you cant".. especially since most people dont get it right... and remember the top 20 players dont count as most people... anyway i resolved this issue thanks to watching DasUndings videos, u can double cap ON ALL M

Hey bro, i totally agree on the pathing, army response, attacking etc But just one thing, do u know that more SS units use energy than PHC? So SS units will run out of energy and not fire, fart around, making them seem like they are morons, meanwhile they dont have energy.. Add capicitors to ur army if this is the issue. Otherwise i do experience similar issues. The game really seems to favour blob on blob combat, and generally favours economy (ie better unit production rates)

[quote who="psychoak" reply="6" id="3663082"] Actually, it's the larger games that have the most cheats. No one bothers to make hacks for the nobody game that nobody knows about, because nobody is playing. [e digicons]:)[/e] Niche games with small multiplayer communities can often stay cheat free entirely, just because there wasn't any real motivation to make them to be a big fish in a really small pond. The vast majority of cheaters are

found this page, it refers to an ini file that reduces settings, im not sure if it could help reduce the lowest settings in game even lower? https://esupport.stardock.com/index.php?/default_import/Knowledgebase/Article/View/530/175/general-ashes-of-the-singularity-troubleshooting

So as a lot of people have mentioned, defensive structures seem very strong, and many think they need a nerf. But I think a portion of this issue comes down to the map layouts. Im not sure why stardock went with this current method. Maybe they are trying to mimic Starcraft??(which specifically has air transports, units that can quickly move around the cliffs or has areas that can be destroyed to open up new lanes of attack, besides the fact that SC defenses are incredibly weak) But wh

im not sure how it works but what about packet interception? or as u said trainers.. they could still be in effect if the largest game companies have cheaters, then we can be sure the smaller game companies will also have cheaters. the security on the larger games is much better yet even their measures are passed...

There always will be cheaters in every type of game. I'm 100% sure there are people in ashes who either are cheating or at least trying to. I'm sure "that guy" wasn't the last of them... But yeah that being said we should be careful of what we think is cheating and what could be either a bug or misunderstanding of the game..

I dont understand the point of this map... Who ever captures and holds the middle for even a moderate amount of time should technically win in a balanced match. Who ever captures and holds the middle gets these benefits: A. they unlock the rest of the map for only themselves, so B. they only have to defend a moderate choke point so C. they have the upper hand in res just from the middle (nevermind the edges) D. its pointless for the 2nd player to even c

u get an orbital power that blocks orbitals for a limited time, the enemy could have cast that (not used their planes bro) of all the methods of cheating, i highly doubt someone would cheat by making an ornital not kill factories... either u were mistaken or a bug

[quote who="Benedictis" reply="6" id="3662909"]- The management and handling of meta units and groups of units [/quote] i think there were some really good points here and i agree on all of it

Since we have no replay option, im assuming there's no way to prove if someone was a hacker? Like i can take a screen shot of the 5 reapers that physically would not die, but one would never know from the screen shot that the reapers were recharging shields miraculously.. Or i could post a screen shot showing that the enemy had an equal military spending, but was somehow able to capture 3 tirinium nodes, and half the map, whereas i was physically only able to capture 4 nodes (so n

I would please like to know which maps its possible to double cap on?

I think a number of players have made threads things that they hope/think should be added to the game, hopefully someone will either correlate those ideas here, or those guys will actually see this thread. But off the top of my head some things i would like are: - Change to the score / namelist (as stated above) reduce its size as well as making it removable (its really takes up a lot of the screen just for an army strength indicator) - Remove/select individual/specific types

im not trying to be mean, but are there two people managing ur account? u say these things, that players should sponsor noobs, then u say things like [quote who="Freyja_Bjorn" reply="1" id="3662301"]but this is mean't to be pushing limits and showing off the limits of hardware. Not back scaling for a small number of people. [/quote] and referring to a complaint about people rushing for stupidly lame 5min quick victories (which are thankfully being nerfed) [quo

[quote who="deutschlandUberalles" reply="3" id="3662572"] hey can i join your stream game to morrow? my steam is Deutchlandûberalles or veknu [/quote] bro when they host their games anyone can join. u were in game last night? so u probably know this already. but for anyone else that reads this.. the more the merrier

[quote who="Freyja_Bjorn" reply="1" id="3662301"] I understand your plight.. but this is mean't to be pushing limits and showing off the limits of hardware. Not back scaling for a small number of people. [/quote] hahahahaha ms-toxic-i-wanna-play-alone-elitism strikes again. hahah really? u actually want people with low end rigs to NOT play? do u not realise that those people actual make up the majority of players? aka u dont want stardock to sell to more consumers?

yeah im also not so keen on playing with the arty the way the game is flowing at the moment. destructors and artemis cant kill a base fast enough if its really entrenched (multiple repair/shield buildings) and in the mean time the arty just keeps firing and killing the army.. so we end up with 2 entrenched players just slowly fighting one another so i would also like an option to turn off the arty

[quote who="fantstc1" reply="28" id="3662090"] Personally, I never have much of a wait for MP. Maybe I'm lucky. ... or maybe just not legendary yet (ended Season 2 at something like #50). My queue times are usually Which isn't SCII or OW, but definitely not horrible for a growing game.[/quote] i think ur queue time is irrespective of ur rank? since i think it matches u with the 1st player it finds. before last week i